I only commented briefly on the process of scoring aggression.
Essentially, if the aggressive fighter is not connecting\scoring then the action is nullified and no points given. I don't believe any judge would or should give credit for aggression simply for aggression's sake, they must make contact with the target.
Holyfield is trying to justify giving credit for aggression, when the aggressor isn't even connecting on the opponent. If that were to become a valid method used to score a fight, then a fighter only needs to charge endlessly to be declared the winner. And that certainly won't work.
Essentially, if the aggressive fighter is not connecting\scoring then the action is nullified and no points given. I don't believe any judge would or should give credit for aggression simply for aggression's sake, they must make contact with the target.
Holyfield is trying to justify giving credit for aggression, when the aggressor isn't even connecting on the opponent. If that were to become a valid method used to score a fight, then a fighter only needs to charge endlessly to be declared the winner. And that certainly won't work.
Comment