Comments Thread For: Mayweather: Even With a KO of Pacquiao, I'd Get No Props

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SplitSecond
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 23151
    • 1,715
    • 1,187
    • 85,044

    #101
    Originally posted by Victorious713
    Floyd was never going to KO Manny. All that talk about Floyd coming out aggressive and going for the KO was all BS. You dont beat pacman at his own game, you outsmart him. Floyd did say he thought Manny fights better going backwards so maybe that was part of his plan.
    he was getting his ass countered to bolivia anytime he stood to try something against pacquiao

    war pacmonster!

    Comment

    • Marvellous1
      Undisputed Champion
      • May 2010
      • 1265
      • 91
      • 0
      • 7,415

      #102
      Pacquiao giving Morales his props:

      https://********/SJrqFGpn0ZM

      Comment

      • jjsmyth87
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2014
        • 2741
        • 95
        • 4
        • 10,723

        #103
        Floyd Sr. Was saying that he wants Floyd to fight khan next. Arum wants pacquiao vs brook. These are the 4 best welterweights and hopefully we get this tournament and it will be mayweather vs. Healthy pacquiao 2. I think it would be almost as big as the first and if pacquiao trounces mayweather in a rematch as I'm sure he would, mayweather pacquiao 3 would be huge

        Comment

        • V.WEBB
          CBVM
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 14327
          • 621
          • 174
          • 21,453

          #104


          Comment

          • V.WEBB
            CBVM
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 14327
            • 621
            • 174
            • 21,453

            #105
            Originally posted by Deevel916
            But he is getting his props. Most if not all boxing experts, writers, announcers are saying that Pac was outclassed although I think that's quite an exaggeration. The problem is that it was an uneventful dull fight. There's not much to speak on. Floyd's plan was to nullify Pac's offense while mounting a very minimal offense of his own. He does what he does best and that's to fight as minimal as possible while doing just enough to win.

            Your opponent landed less than 100 shots in 12 rounds isn't outclassing them?

            Winning 10 rounds isn't outclassing them?

            Landing 48% of your shots isn't outclassing them?

            Making your opponent miss and countering them isn't outclassing them?

            You're a clown, like we've known for years now.

            Comment

            • SplitSecond
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2009
              • 23151
              • 1,715
              • 1,187
              • 85,044

              #106
              Originally posted by V.WEBB


              at putting in marquez' ko like it was something floyd did

              Comment

              • V.WEBB
                CBVM
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Dec 2009
                • 14327
                • 621
                • 174
                • 21,453

                #107
                Originally posted by SplitSecond
                at putting in marquez' ko like it was something floyd did
                I didn't make it, just saw it in someone's avatar.

                But I feel you doe.

                Comment

                • ramses07
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Apr 2011
                  • 2006
                  • 226
                  • 88
                  • 23,870

                  #108
                  Originally posted by V.WEBB
                  Your opponent landed less than 100 shots in 12 rounds isn't outclassing them?

                  Winning 10 rounds isn't outclassing them?

                  Landing 48% of your shots isn't outclassing them?

                  Making your opponent miss and countering them isn't outclassing them?

                  You're a clown, like we've known for years now.
                  pretty sure it wasn't 10 rounds....official scorecard were 9-3,8-4 twice..with most ppl agreeing with 8-4. i wouldn't say outclassing bc pacquiao had his moments and floyd fought very tentative.

                  outclassing is what floyd did canelo, gatti, corrales. etc

                  i don't know what worse ppl saying pacquiao won or ppl exaggerating the manner in which floyd won.

                  Comment

                  • Ravens Fan
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 4051
                    • 167
                    • 0
                    • 10,372

                    #109
                    I cannot stand Floyd and I give him major props. I also still don't think much of him as a human being but I have gained much respect for him as a fighter.

                    Comment

                    • Deevel916
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 7068
                      • 282
                      • 47
                      • 13,675

                      #110
                      Originally posted by V.WEBB
                      Your opponent landed less than 100 shots in 12 rounds isn't outclassing them?

                      Winning 10 rounds isn't outclassing them?

                      Landing 48% of your shots isn't outclassing them?

                      Making your opponent miss and countering them isn't outclassing them?

                      You're a clown, like we've known for years now.
                      That's your take on the fight. Did Floyd win? Of course, but in addition to Pac winning 3 clear rounds there were also a few very close rounds that could have went Pac's way. 7-5 or 8-4 would not have been out of the question. Far from the "schooling" or "domination" that I see being thrown around.

                      Its easy to make it seem like a schooling by saying that Floyd won 10 rounds until you analyze each round and see that the rounds Floyd won were by the slimmest of margins. There was no round were Floyd had Pac hurt, in trouble, or totally dominated.

                      Its also easy to make it seem as if Floyd was landing power shots on Floyd by saying that Floyd landed 48% of his shots when in reality many of those "shots" were Floyd sticking his glove out and touching Manny. Floyd also got credit for many shots that didn't even land.

                      Someone listening to you would think that Pac landed no punches on Floyd and the entire fight was made up of Floyd making Pac completely miss and countering him with pounding shots. LOL.

                      Lets not turn a Floyd points decision win into something it isn't.
                      Last edited by Deevel916; 05-07-2015, 08:10 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP