It seems as though there are a lot of people praying for Haymon's downfall in his business ventures with PBC, where high-quality bouts are aired FOR FREE on national networks such as NBC and CBS. While it may seem a bit hypocritical as a boxing fan, I can definitely see why some people are praying for his downfall, we can agree that it's a personal thing for them. Fortunately, a large portion of Haymon detractors have left the sport permanently within the last couple of days. However, many Haymon critics still remain.
My question to Haymon critics is simple, what are you upset about? What about his business model is upsetting to you? What is unfair to you? Is he treating his stable unfairly, and if so, how? He's known for being the guy to get his fighters the absolute best, most reliable contracts in boxing period. He gets his fighters paid, and the fighters seem to have no issue with it at all. And now we know that most legitimate PROMOTERS have no problem with Haymon either. If you want proof, check out what Lou Dibella said about Golden Boy's rediculous $200 million dollar lawsuit filed against Haymon recently. It's on the front page of BoxingScene.
1. Fighters have no issues with Haymon and his business model
2. Competent promoters have no issues with Haymon and his business model
3. Most unbiased boxing fans have no issues with Haymon's business model, especially since it's beneficial to US from a viewing standpoint
4. So that brings me to the question, why do you, as a boxing "FAN" take issue with it?
And even after you've gone and reviewed the FACTS and still disagree with his business model, are you willing to sacrifice those free PBC bouts on CBS and NBC? Are you willing to sacrifice the fact that great fights will go back to taking forever to materialize due to shady promoters not wanting to work with each other like GBP and TR? Because under Haymon's business model, which is sort of like the UFC, all of the fighters in his stable have steady opponents to choose from since it's such a big stable. If you start splitting these fighters up who ARE currently with Haymon, then it goes back to being a mess.
My question to Haymon critics is simple, what are you upset about? What about his business model is upsetting to you? What is unfair to you? Is he treating his stable unfairly, and if so, how? He's known for being the guy to get his fighters the absolute best, most reliable contracts in boxing period. He gets his fighters paid, and the fighters seem to have no issue with it at all. And now we know that most legitimate PROMOTERS have no problem with Haymon either. If you want proof, check out what Lou Dibella said about Golden Boy's rediculous $200 million dollar lawsuit filed against Haymon recently. It's on the front page of BoxingScene.
1. Fighters have no issues with Haymon and his business model
2. Competent promoters have no issues with Haymon and his business model
3. Most unbiased boxing fans have no issues with Haymon's business model, especially since it's beneficial to US from a viewing standpoint
4. So that brings me to the question, why do you, as a boxing "FAN" take issue with it?
And even after you've gone and reviewed the FACTS and still disagree with his business model, are you willing to sacrifice those free PBC bouts on CBS and NBC? Are you willing to sacrifice the fact that great fights will go back to taking forever to materialize due to shady promoters not wanting to work with each other like GBP and TR? Because under Haymon's business model, which is sort of like the UFC, all of the fighters in his stable have steady opponents to choose from since it's such a big stable. If you start splitting these fighters up who ARE currently with Haymon, then it goes back to being a mess.
Comment