Should boxing judges be subject to polygraphs?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Boxfan83
    The Coach
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2015
    • 15837
    • 2,100
    • 731
    • 160,371

    #1

    Should boxing judges be subject to polygraphs?

    Now I know this seems a little far-fetch but with the amount of money that is placed for betting on "BIG" fights especially in Vegas, do you think Judges should take random lie detector test to avoid corruption? Lets face it, we have all seen some outrageous judging and everyone points fingers to fixed fights or corrupt judging. I think random lie detector test for judges and possibly referees would do the sport of boxing a lot more "good" than random drug testing...
  • b00g13man
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2012
    • 12197
    • 265
    • 51
    • 34,905

    #2
    When exactly do they take these polygraph tests? After the cards have been filled out, before the results are announced?

    Comment

    • Boxfan83
      The Coach
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Feb 2015
      • 15837
      • 2,100
      • 731
      • 160,371

      #3
      Originally posted by b00g13man
      When exactly do they take these polygraph tests? After the cards have been filled out, before the results are announced?
      I think randomly throughout the year. With questions asked whether bribes have been taken/offered and what their responses were. I know a very high profile vegas referee who told me soon after he became a ref he was confronted with bribes, so fixes are very real. I worked with this guy for years and know hes straight as an arrow but $ talks and some people do have breaking points so you never know so random test should be taken. Polygraphs are not 100% accurate so a failure shouldnt result in criminal cases but suspensions & athletic commission reviews of their fights should be a result...

      Comment

      • Basco
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2012
        • 3120
        • 225
        • 285
        • 12,732

        #4
        WTF?

        Comment

        • jas
          Voice of Reason
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2005
          • 22531
          • 936
          • 914
          • 1,059,614

          #5
          not a bad idea if a polygraph was reliable

          how reliable is it

          Comment

          • b00g13man
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2012
            • 12197
            • 265
            • 51
            • 34,905

            #6
            Originally posted by Boxfan83
            I think randomly throughout the year. With questions asked whether bribes have been taken/offered and what their responses were. I know a very high profile vegas referee who told me soon after he became a ref he was confronted with bribes, so fixes are very real. I worked with this guy for years and know hes straight as an arrow but $ talks and some people do have breaking points so you never know so random test should be taken. Polygraphs are not 100% accurate so a failure shouldnt result in criminal cases but suspensions & athletic commission reviews of their fights should be a result...
            I think you're on your own here buddy.

            Comment

            • johnm is...
              ****in *** Broads
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Oct 2005
              • 10700
              • 820
              • 1,382
              • 48,813

              #7


              Sure!

              Matter of fact, we need to get the FBI involved.

              Comment

              • STREET CLEANER
                The Watcher
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Feb 2010
                • 19498
                • 4,749
                • 4,366
                • 298,225

                #8
                How can you polygraph somebody's opinion?

                Comment

                • Boxfan83
                  The Coach
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Feb 2015
                  • 15837
                  • 2,100
                  • 731
                  • 160,371

                  #9
                  Originally posted by b00g13man
                  I think you're on your own here buddy.
                  Maybe I am, but lets say you bet a large amount of $ on a big fight and it was very controversial ending. Wouldn't you want to know what the judges were thinking?

                  Comment

                  • Boxfan83
                    The Coach
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Feb 2015
                    • 15837
                    • 2,100
                    • 731
                    • 160,371

                    #10
                    Originally posted by STREET CLEANER
                    How can you polygraph somebody's opinion?
                    If their opinion was based on a bribe, sure you can. Police/Federal agents are subject to polygraph all the time based on such allegations.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP