Did the match do more harm or good for boxing?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • $Bullsfam$
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 10252
    • 813
    • 630
    • 46,956

    #11
    This is why it was a HUGE mistake to put on such a shiiiit undercard. Canelo and Kirkland should of been on this along with Lucas and Ruslan. That would of been worth $100.

    I don't think it was boring it would of been fine if they didn't jack up the prices. That's why people are salty and why this hurt boxing.

    Comment

    • broblin
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Jan 2007
      • 210
      • 6
      • 1
      • 6,369

      #12
      Yeah, while both Lomachenko and Santa Cruz are interesting young fighters, it would have been nice to see some better, more exciting undercard fights, between big name boxers.

      Comment

      • CANELOLUJAH
        --Boxing Savior!--
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2013
        • 4190
        • 195
        • 168
        • 11,132

        #13
        harm was a pathetic showing from both.

        Comment

        • KillaMane26
          Big Boi Beezy
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Apr 2014
          • 16298
          • 2,565
          • 533
          • 174,475

          #14
          HArm...the world stopped for this lame ass fight....what a let down......Realize every big fight has been a let-down.....Both guys could have done more....not like either have KO power they could have went toe to toe a little and let their hands go....but oh well....im not a casual anyway

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP