Originally posted by D.I.E.S.E.L
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Teddy Atlas: Pacquiao is Not as Big, You Figure Out Why!
Collapse
-
Originally posted by El-blanco View PostAnd guess who manny was working with at that time you think his head grew? The same guy Floyd is working with. FOH puta.
Comment
-
-
-
Hilarious.
I see no difference between pac now and pac 6 years ago except for the fact that he has aged.
Jesus tap dancing christ...
Comment
-
Originally posted by nathan_nall View PostBecause he couldn't have possibly gotten better with age and experience. I'm not going to try and get you to think rationally because this is just a message board. If someone approached you in real life and, face to face, asked you to weigh in, I'm sure you'd be a lot more sensible. Also, I don't think you really believe that Pacquiao was juicing. It's just one of those online things that's fun to take part in... like Thin Man or Monsanto GMO conspiracies.
But, what evidence does anyone have other than reading into Pacquiao's performances over the years? If taking punches better and rolling through competition means your a juicer, we might as well throw our hands up and just allow it in the sport, because the sport is riddled with juicers. Anyone who lost in the amateurs but has a winning record as a pro has to be juicing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by elishua F View PostStop it.. how the hell does a fighter "get better" at taking jabs to the face.. did you see his fight vs Hussein, the 4th round.. the weakest jab in boxing history had him cross eye .. this was year 2000..then a few years later he steamrolls barrera.. he was juiced
Comment
-
Today
Vs Cotto
I don't really see much difference, maybe more cut back then. Either way, isn't normal for a 36 year old man supposed to have less muscle mass than when he was 31?
Comment
-
Originally posted by VERDUGO View Postin what fight did Pacquiao looked bigger?Originally posted by madsweeney View PostToday
Vs Cotto
I don't really see much difference, maybe more cut back then. Either way, isn't normal for a 36 year old man supposed to have less muscle mass than when he was 31?
Comment
Comment