FAO: Floyd Mayweather Jr. Supporters

[Robbie Barrett]

Mayweathers resume is ****, if he got beat by Cotto and fought him another two times and won it'd be better.

[joesaiditstrue]

Baldomir is up there.


Josie Harris

harris fight was a f'n robbery, she should still be undefeated

[Left Hook Tua]

Mayweathers resume is ****, if he got beat by Cotto and fought him another two times and won it'd be better.

list 9 of floyds best opponents please.

[Left Hook Tua]

1. Corrales

2. Castillo

3. Cotto

4. Marquez

5. Hatton

6. Mosley

7. Alvarez

8. De La Hoya

9. Judah

alvarez and delahoya kinda low.

cotto waaay too high.

i agree with the guys but i'd put delahoya/alvarez 3-4.

[Left Hook Tua]

So fighting a guy 4 times because you never got a clear victory is better than fighting him once and dominating?

fighting JMM 4 times > maidana/castillo 4 times

[Left Hook Tua]

fighting morales 3 times > gatti, guerrero, baldomir

[IMDAZED]

alvarez and delahoya kinda low.

cotto waaay too high.

i agree with the guys but i'd put delahoya/alvarez 3-4.

I guess I have a higher opinion of Cotto than most. To me, he's also Manny's second best win.

Also, more important than who is when. Which is why I don't rate some wins as highly as others.

[Robbie Barrett]

fighting JMM 4 times > maidana/castillo 4 times

If Mayweather struggled with JMM and fought him 4 times would it have made his resume better?

[HEND]

fighting JMM 4 times > maidana/castillo 4 times

No you're wrong. Your resume won't be better just because you fight more times with the same guys. It's usually only makes sense because either the first fight was a financial/excitement boom or if he revenges his loss. Mayweaher beat clearly every of his opponents first time except Castillo and see: He fought a rematch with Castillo. He fought with Maidana two times also but that was rather because there wasn't any other normal opponent for him that time, first Maidana fight was hard for Mayweather but almost everyone thought that he won.
Back to the point: If he already beat Cotto, DLH, etc... why he would have fought a rematch? He proved that he is better, your arguement makes no sense. If he would foufgt DLH and Mosley 3 times totally unnecessarily his resume would be better? They would dd to his resume like they would be wins over different opponents? Oh c'mon... Resume is about who you defeated and who defeated you not about how many time you defeated the person who was clearly beaten by you first time. In fact, if someone fight one opponent multiple time is not so good because it assumes that you fought that opponents multiple times because you couldn't win or couldn't win convincingly enough first time. Why do you think Pac fought JMM 4 times? Becaue in the public/media eyes he never beat him convincingly.
Mayweather proved that he is better he moved forward, nothing wrong with that
I won't say order but his 9 (why exactly 9 btw?) best wins are:
DLH
Cotto
Judah
Canelo
Hatton
Corrales
Castillo
Marquez
Canelo

[HEND]

Tbh I wouldn't even call myself a Floyd supporter because I don't like his persona but I totally recognize his resume and achievements and I don't get mad over pitty-patty things like he calls himself "TBE". It's called marketing motherfuckers...
And his domestic violence etc... also nothing has to do with his resume, skills, greatness in sport, etc... Because of these things I won't be his fan but neither I will try to downgrade his achievments.