Andre Dirrell should beat James DeGale comfortably.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NEETzsche
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Oct 2011
    • 8389
    • 283
    • 176
    • 29,441

    #21
    dirrell will find a way to lose

    Comment

    • $£X
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Mar 2015
      • 212
      • 14
      • 0
      • 6,350

      #22
      Dirrell defeated Froch and Abraham, but some think he will lose to DeGale? LoL.

      Comment

      • Blue Heffner
        Blackjack
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 15935
        • 373
        • 323
        • 24,659

        #23
        Originally posted by NEETzsche
        dirrell will find a way to lose
        Yep. My verdict is that he'll feel DeGale's power and start retreating the whole fight.

        Comment

        • New England
          Strong champion.
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2010
          • 37514
          • 1,926
          • 1,486
          • 97,173

          #24
          Originally posted by _original_
          I don't know much about DeGale, hopefully this is a good fight.



          he's not very talented or skilled. dirrell has basically every athletic advantage. power, speed, and reach by the look of it.

          degale's advantages are his level of activity, and his brain.


          dirrell is a bird brain. degale seems like he's actually pretty steady in there, for a brit.

          Comment

          • New England
            Strong champion.
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2010
            • 37514
            • 1,926
            • 1,486
            • 97,173

            #25
            Originally posted by NEETzsche
            dirrell will find a way to lose


            this is what you worry about. i'm also a bit worried about dirrell's chin. why fight like a wimp if you're not protecting a bad chin / inability to deal with firepower coming back? is he just that soft mentally? i don't think so. i think there's something that he's hiding.


            dirrell was faster than basically anybody at 168. he had the tools to be a terrific offensive fighter. lots of snap, fast hands, tons of range. he should ahve beaten the hell out of froch, who had no answer for his speed, but he didn't. i thought dirrell won that fight, but he didn't beat the hell out of froch the way he should.

            Comment

            • VG_Addict
              king meat's twin
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jun 2012
              • 5618
              • 237
              • 3
              • 53,380

              #26
              DeGale looked lost in the Groves fight when he was forced to be the aggressor.

              Comment

              • VatoMulatto
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Nov 2003
                • 8168
                • 289
                • 218
                • 104,445

                #27


                Damn! I feel like an idiot....I was wrong and I have to take my hat off to DeGale. It was a well deserved close win so more power to him. I thought Dirrell would dominate and that didn't really happen.......BUT I still think Dirrell is the better boxer. I would actually favor Dirrell to win a rematch.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP