Is Peterson back on the testosterone pelets?

[Weebler I]

I like Lamont a lot but he's been down against Khan, Ortiz, Mathyse and 3 times against Brdaley. He got gifts against both Khan and Ortiz. He's a very solid fighter. He's just never been bigger, stronger and more resiliant than he was tonight.

He looked powerful too, he hurt Garcia at one point and we know Garcia has a very good chin.

This is the same Peterson that Khan was eating punch after punch from without getting hurt and the same Peterson who struggled to get an old Edgar Santana out of there in his last fight.

There's no reason for Peterson not to be on testosterone pellets because he had a doctor's note covering him.

[Tay Roc]

3lbs? helluva turnaround. As someone else mentioned the LM-LP fight was at 141.

Matthysse fight Peterson was 141->149

Danny Garcia fight Peterson was 143 -> 165

still 3lbs? Looks like 16 to me. Thus, the greater punch resistance. Idiot.

[Weebler I]

Matthysse fight Peterson was 141->149

Danny Garcia fight Peterson was 143 -> 165

still 3lbs? Looks like 16 to me. Thus, the greater punch resistance. Idiot.

You know you could've made your point without the insult, you're hardly a genius yourself.

Anyhow, the guy looked huge in comparison to Garcia, extra power and punch resistance on his prior performances. He's failed a drug test before, it's only natural (no pun) that questions would be raised.

[Tay Roc]

You know you could've made your point without the insult, you're hardly a genius yourself.

Anyhow, the guy looked huge in comparison to Garcia, extra power and punch resistance on his prior performances. He's failed a drug test before, it's only natural (no pun) that questions would be raised.

You could have also made your point without sarcasm, "helluva turnaround." Especially when you completely failed to understand my post.

I've never claimed to be a genius.

Get some sleep, bruv. Come back tomorrow with a fresh mind.

[krazyn8tive]

That's a serious question guys. When he admitted to having used it after the Khan fight he said in an interview that he didn't have enough energy and power or something along those lines. Basically, he was taking it cause he didn't have the energy to train.

Now he's 165 on fight night, he runs like crazy, he takes shots like nothing, even Danny's low blows, speaking of which, when Danny is in some kind of trouble he won't quit but he'll bust you low. He did it against Mathyse the entire fight and did it again against Peterson the second part of the fight. It's just that Peterson was too damn strong and Danny's low blows and left hooks had zero impact on this fight.

The thing is Peterson and his corner are so dumb they pretty much gave away the first 7 rounds or so. I get it, boxers and not very intelligent, but this was another level of dumb. Peterson, as strong as he was, could've dismantled Danny in 6-8 rounds on the inside. Instead, he started fighting around round 8 and really turned it up in rounds 11 and 12.

Hate Danny, like Peterson a lot but he lost by a round for being dumb.

PS: Maidana vs Garcia ends in a disqualification due to low blows.

Black fighters are slick, Mexicans are warriors, and puerto ricans punch you in the d1ck. Don't act new.

[miniq]

Khan peterson was 140 to 155

PEDerson can still get a passed usada tests with a 6 to 1 testosterone ratio...

Testing is flawed....

[DoktorSleepless]

Don't USADA have that medical exemption loophole though?

They do, but it doesn't seem as simple as getting a doctor's note. (and especially from the type of hack doctor Peterson had) Peterson wouldn't quality.

http://www.usada.org/wp-content/uploads/TUE_guidance_androgen_deficiency_male_hypogonadism-testosterone.pdf

• The The****utic Use Exemption Committee (TUEC) must review the entire evaluation for hypogonadism. They need enough
  medical information, clinic notes and laboratory testing notes to make the same diagnosis, and arrive at the same treatment plan as you without ever seeing the patient.
• It is extremely unlikely that a The****utic Use Exemption will be approved for "functional" hypogonadism (a diagnosis of hypogonadism based on low testosterone (T) levels but without a defined etiology).
• The International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions specifically statesthat "low-normal" levels of any hormone will not justify the granting of a TUE.
• USADA will not grant TUEsfor testosterone to females, including Hormone Replacement Therapiesthat contain testosterone, because there are permitted the****utic alternatives available.
• The use of T as an anti-aging medication for men is not justification for a TUE. Similarly, generalized fatigue, slow recovery
  from exercise and a decreased libido are not, in isolation, justification for the granting of a TUE for testosterone. [I recall this is the justification Peterson gave for his use]
• All TUE applicationsfor T based on secondary hypogonadism should include a detailed history of corticosteroid & opiate
  use. Consider documentation of sella imaging & exclusion of hematochromatosis.

The type of people would probably be approved would be those that hit puberty really late and had trouble with it starting from a young age. (and would need documentation to prove it)

[Weebler I]

They don't, but it doesn't seem as simple as getting a doctor's note. (and especially from the type of hack doctor Peterson had) Peterson wouldn't quality.
http://www.usada.org/wp-content/uplo...stosterone.pdf

Cheers, I just remember it coming up in the VADA versus USADA debates.

You could have also made your point without sarcasm, "helluva turnaround." Especially when you completely failed to understand my post.

I've never claimed to be a genius.

Get some sleep, bruv. Come back tomorrow with a fresh mind.

It wasn't sarcasm, it was a descriptive comment based on the minimal weigh-in disparity between the two bouts and I wasn't the first to make the observation, pesticid was. But whatever, you want to get uptight about it that's on you, I don't care enough to argue.

[Tay Roc]

It wasn't sarcasm, it was a descriptive comment based on the minimal weigh-in disparity between the two bouts and I wasn't the first to make the observation, pesticid was. But whatever, you want to get uptight about it that's on you, I don't care enough to argue.

Okay, then stop responding and read more carefully.

Good night, bruv.

[Southpaw93]

Did Danny Garcia even hit Lamont with anything that would hurt him? Danny rarely hit him flush.