Who is the fighter of the 2000's so far?

[TheEvilSaint]

floyd mayweather, no doubt.

[Violent Demise]

Floyd Mayweather. And so far it's a easy choice. He's done the most, without losing.

[TheGreat1]

i was going to say Tarver

[nelsoncm]

That's true.

But it's hard to give people enjoyable fights when you outclass them and knock them out with your superior handspeed and skills.

If Mayweather keeps on fighting and winning against the best in the division he's currently in, he may well be the fighter of the decade.

He's untouchable.

[JOM'S]

obviously i voted for PAC due to my biases, lol ...

kidding aside among the selection on the list only Manny has very high UPSIDE potential and could develope into a more complete fighter... maybe the only one that can upstage PBF ...

[magicjordan]

obviously i voted for PAC due to my biases, lol ...

kidding aside among the selection on the list only Manny has very high UPSIDE potential and could develope into a more complete fighter... maybe the only one that can upstage PBF ...

i agree w/ you.i will go for manny pacquiao.he is a complete fighter now!he beat all the great boxers in his division.

[SMC]

No Ricky Hatton? sort it out..

[JOM'S]

No Ricky Hatton? sort it out..

good question, Hatton would have a good upside potential as well..

[BLOODSHED]

Rick Hatton has one win on his resume WITH FORTY FIGHTS. Hell no he isn't on my list.

No Ricky Hatton? sort it out..

[SMC]

Rick Hatton has one win on his resume WITH FORTY FIGHTS. Hell no he isn't on my list.

Huh? sorry the language barrier might be a factor here..