paulie malignaggi is a fraud

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • suberstar_zx6R
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Feb 2006
    • 134
    • 8
    • 0
    • 6,490

    #1

    paulie malignaggi is a fraud

    IMO this guy is another prince naz. he has a big mouth, he built up his record fighting low level comp. but at least naz was KOing people, and now that hes steping up the comp. hes going to be exposed just like naz was. i cant stand when the networks try to pass these guys off as legit contenders when theyre not. theyres no way in hell this guy should be in the main event of a PPV


    Last edited by suberstar_zx6R; 03-25-2006, 12:58 AM.
  • TyrantT316
    Willing to fight the best
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2003
    • 4025
    • 281
    • 2
    • 13,939

    #2
    I hope you understand that this is boxing. Everyone that shows promise vs good competition or NOT gets hyped. That is just the way it goes. Get over it.

    Comment

    • suberstar_zx6R
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Feb 2006
      • 134
      • 8
      • 0
      • 6,490

      #3
      i understand that i just think its BS that we have to pay $50.00 to watch this fool get KTFO.

      Comment

      • the_truth_1984
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Feb 2006
        • 683
        • 14
        • 0
        • 6,990

        #4
        I don't think he is a fraud just not ready to step up to the likes of Cotto.

        Comment

        • suberstar_zx6R
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Feb 2006
          • 134
          • 8
          • 0
          • 6,490

          #5
          ok maybe fraud is to strong but hes def. not PPV worthy but **** neither is cotto.

          Comment

          • USA4LIFE
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2005
            • 4665
            • 171
            • 291
            • 12,387

            #6
            Originally posted by suberstar_zx6R
            ok maybe fraud is to strong but hes def. not PPV worthy but **** neither is cotto.
            I agree, especially this early in his career there is no way he's PPV worthy yet. I don't think he will ever be PPV worth to be honest with you.

            Comment

            • suberstar_zx6R
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Feb 2006
              • 134
              • 8
              • 0
              • 6,490

              #7
              BTW how many PPVs did the prince have? i think it was only 1 with MAB.

              Comment

              • nelsoncm
                i'm proud to be gay
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2003
                • 1846
                • 54
                • 0
                • 9,819

                #8
                THe man with the biggest mouth in boxing is gonna get exposed.

                Comment

                • DiegoFuego
                  Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jan 2005
                  • 17338
                  • 1,403
                  • 586
                  • 24,657

                  #9
                  how is he a fraud if he's already fighting Cotto? These guys are still essentially prospects although Cotto is climbing the ladder quickly. Neither of these guys are frauds because they accepted this fight. but don't pay to watch them fight. that would be a joke.

                  Comment

                  • Violent Demise
                    F**k Your Life
                    • Aug 2005
                    • 1537
                    • 122
                    • 68
                    • 8,270

                    #10
                    Originally posted by suberstar_zx6R
                    ok maybe fraud is to strong but hes def. not PPV worthy but **** neither is cotto.
                    Nah, I think fraud was just right. You could of also used joke.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP