Comments Thread For: Khan: Brook Will Fool The UK, Fight Another No No Dan!

[mathed]

Khan just go away already, no one thinks you are a king and everyone knows you are a con.

[Yaconcha]

said it before will say it again, we, the british public did like king con and when the loser came back from the olympics we embraced it then, greed set it in...she got battered and found out very early with her whiskers being as they are then, she got all mouthy with the "im goin to america because their the center of everything" we saw this comin and backed away then, our interest then changed to enjoying watching the mouthy little **** get knocked the fack out by pretty much anybody her extremely vunerable chin was tapped by.
no no dan? yeah, what about willie limond? lol or paul mccloskey? and they were very close to winning! mcloskey was promised a rematch on the night (in the post fight interview) but, roach wanted no part of that for the weak chinned superstar! fact: she has no chin no matter how you glamourise it in being any different.
he had been saying publically that kell brook is a nobody for atleast four or five years i know that he has to up his game and that he wont touch him without a title. kell has one and king con refused and yet mocks jo jo dan? with his losing record and kells "0"? is she real? how can this idiot reallt beleive he can fool us here that hes better when we clearly believe hes avoiding getting battered by the easily better boxer.
kell has a chin and is unbeaten, why wouldnt the bum not want to take his "0"?
scared to lose to another british fighter plain and simple. she makes the xcuses about money?! eddie hearn could do wembley! its been offered!
total loser and insulting the inteligence of every british boxing fan. ****.

[Shogun99]

said it before will say it again, we, the british public did like king con and when the loser came back from the olympics we embraced it then, greed set it in...she got battered and found out very early with her whiskers being as they are then, she got all mouthy with the "im goin to america because their the center of everything" we saw this comin and backed away then, our interest then changed to enjoying watching the mouthy little **** get knocked the fack out by pretty much anybody her extremely vunerable chin was tapped by.
no no dan? yeah, what about willie limond? lol or paul mccloskey? and they were very close to winning! mcloskey was promised a rematch on the night (in the post fight interview) but, roach wanted no part of that for the weak chinned superstar! fact: she has no chin no matter how you glamourise it in being any different.
he had been saying publically that kell brook is a nobody for atleast four or five years i know that he has to up his game and that he wont touch him without a title. kell has one and king con refused and yet mocks jo jo dan? with his losing record and kells "0"? is she real? how can this idiot reallt beleive he can fool us here that hes better when we clearly believe hes avoiding getting battered by the easily better boxer.
kell has a chin and is unbeaten, why wouldnt the bum not want to take his "0"?
scared to lose to another british fighter plain and simple. she makes the xcuses about money?! eddie hearn could do wembley! its been offered!
total loser and insulting the inteligence of every british boxing fan. ****.

LMAO McCloskey was close to winning? What kind of expired crack are you on? Nothing wrong with criticizing Khan's decisions but you just exposed yourself as a full blown hater with that ******ed remark.

[LacedUp]

I doubt Haymon would have a problem with it if Thurman wants it. Dirrell didn't want to fight in the UK. Thurman isn't like the majority of today's fighters, his attitude is old school.

Thurman vs Brook is a 50-50 fight, I'm not saying Brook is scared or anything, but it's a fight that could be and should be made.

Talks already happened with Al about Thurman and he wants the fight, but only in the US. As they want to build him there. Obviously Brook is not going to the U.S. When it's a PPV fight in the UK.

That's why it's not happening.

[LacedUp]

Is it Kells fault or Eddie Hern?

Hern said Kell will be fighting someone in the IBF Top 15, where does Gavin Rank? no 3? i think Porter is no 4

Anyways Brooks already gettin a lot of slack on twitter about fighting Gavin, by moderate fans, so this is not a good look.

According to Khan, Brook is fighting Antonin Decarie, and most people are going to ask "who"

Obviously Hearn. They want him out on the card in a stay busy fight because he's been riddled by injuries in the last 3 years. They want momentum going. Nobody can't expect a big fight on May 30th as they have plans of doing a big fight in the summer.

So if he fights Gavin on May 30 and Rios or Marquez in July/August. I would think that's pretty acceptable.

Khan only fights twice a year so you would expect both those fights to be against top opposition. Especially after how he's talked about deserving May or Pacquiao.

[BoxngLove]

It is almost every other thread now, "What does Khan think about that or this?" "Why does Khan feel the whole world is ducking him" blah blah blah. Nobody gives 2 ****s about that guy.

[SnakeVen0m]

Does this moron realize he's fighting Chris Algieri? The irony is strong with Khant.

[mikey077]

Khan is 100% correct. Brooke doesnt want to put the work and the time in. He wants to make shortcuts in his career and you can best believe he takes shortcuts in everything else. Thats probably why he's out getting beaten up and stabbed by civilians in barroom brawls.

wtf you on about? when has brook taken a shortcut? if that was the case book would have found the quickest way to a title, khan is 100% looking for shortcuts at 147 hasn't fought a genuine welterweight yet and still thinks he is in line for mayweather or pacquaio next. secondly how the **** is getting hacked with a machete classed as being beaten up?

[salitap4p#1]

mccloskey, salita, molina