Frddie Roach - The boxer...How good was he?

[Reloaded]

The highlights speak for themselves. He was a World Class warrior, period. Prime for prime, Roach knocks Judah the **** out. Judah lacks heart, determination... Roach had and still has both. If Roach would have kept healthy, he would have been top 10-15 of all time. There is a reason why he made Pacquiao into the greatest fighter of all time.

Youre the dumbest poster on this forum , you see a few cans and all off a sudden he is world class fighter , go to boxing school kid because you dont know sht .

[danceswithfire]

Youre the dumbest poster on this forum , you see a few cans and all off a sudden he is world class fighter , go to boxing school kid because you dont know sht .

the irony,

[Dirk Diggler UK]

The highlights speak for themselves. He was a World Class warrior, period. Prime for prime, Roach knocks Judah the **** out. Judah lacks heart, determination... Roach had and still has both. If Roach would have kept healthy, he would have been top 10-15 of all time. There is a reason why he made Pacquiao into the greatest fighter of all time.

If he would have kept healthy? What, by not getting repeatedly battered and abused in the ring?

[Reloaded]

the irony,

The irony is the way you fools band together , something about like attracting like idiots attracting idiots .

[TBear]

I watched a lot of Roach's fights back in the day. Even though he was a fan favorite he was pretty much a club fighter. That is no reflection on his training abilities however. Ask how the late Emanuel Steward, Eddie Futch or even Lou Duva did in their boxing careers. Trainers are often great trainers without ever being great fighters.

[just the facts]

The highlights speak for themselves. He was a World Class warrior, period. Prime for prime, Roach knocks Judah the **** out. Judah lacks heart, determination... Roach had and still has both. If Roach would have kept healthy, he would have been top 10-15 of all time. There is a reason why he made Pacquiao into the greatest fighter of all time.

Even you can't be this ******. There was nothing world class about Roach as a fighter. Roach was fun to watch, but lost to every decent fighter he ever fought and was nothing more than a face first brawler. Top 10-15 all time? GTFOH!

I guess I should expect dumb shyte like this from the idiot that thinks GGG (with ZERO quality wins) is the best fighter of all time

[George Orwell]

pretty damn close to be being a bum like Mickey Rourke but he's a level up from that

[Dean_Razorback]

he had povetkin's haircut

[VatoMulatto]

Never seen him box and I would bet alot of money neither has 95% of this forum. These questions about yesteryears boxers always crack me up. I would bet my bottom dollar these 20 somethings that post here don't know the answers to these questions. Maybe a small group of posters 35+ do. Me being 30 years old, I've followed boxing since the early 90's so how can I tell you about Freddie Roach? Am I supposed to watch your video and now have the answers?

C'mon now....We shouldn't start threads about fighters from back in the day because maybe most people have not seen enough material, is that what you're saying? No more discussions on fighters from the '50s '60s '70s '80s...