Comments Thread For: Khan Ready For Broner Next, Doubts He Accepts Fight

[FrankieBruno]

No one can beat Kahn through 12 rounds ! U have to knock Kahn out to win , everyone should know this by now . Kahn's leather output per round is more than anyone out there and therefore u won't out point him . Kahn was CLEARLY robbed in DC verses Peterson . Broner doesn't have the power or countering skills to KO Kahn and therefore won't stand a chance .

Broner has more power than Julio Diaz

If he lands anything noteworthy, and with his fast hands he is very capable

Khan will have to be at his very best

[Nightfall]

of coure he's ready for broner, there's no threat to his cotton chin there. AB to me is truly a lightweight.

i just love seeing Khunt and his fans rationalize how AB is a better fight than thurman or brook.

khan won't fight neither of them. he's all talk

[danceswithfire]

Exactly. Porter greater than Khan's entire welterweight run.

I would have to agree had brook beat him clearly, was not the case

[SugarRaRobinson]

Broner has more power than Julio Diaz

If he lands anything noteworthy, and with his fast hands he is very capable

Khan will have to be at his very best

I don't know who hits harder cause I've never been hit by either of them . But , to me , Broner doesn't appear to have a viable chance due to the fact that if u look at all Kahn's KO's and knockdowns , they all came against vicious counterpunching opponents . Since Broner is not a counterpuncher , he doesn't stand much of a chance .

[danceswithfire]

Brook did decisively beat Porter. You're actually the only person I've heard claim that. There's no way the fight could have gone either way. There was one clear winner and it wasn't Porter.

im the only one?. you haven't been paying attention round here then or at all

[SugarRaRobinson]

Actually , danceswithfire is correct , many people on here do say that Brook didnt beat Porter decisively . I just don't know why they say that ??? If ineffective aggression equated to winning rounds then porter would have won decisively !

[FrankieBruno]

I don't know who hits harder cause I've never been hit by either of them . But , to me , Broner doesn't appear to have a viable chance due to the fact that if u look at all Kahn's KO's and knockdowns , they all came against vicious counterpunching opponents . Since Broner is not a counterpuncher , he doesn't stand much of a chance .

Paulie said Broner hits hard, and so did Maidana

So thats all i need to know...he has enough to put Khan down

If Khan puts a foot wrong, he'll be doing the twerk

Like i said Khan has to be on his A game, anything less and it's over

[FrankieBruno]

Actually , danceswithfire is correct , many people on here do say that Brook didnt beat Porter decisively . I just don't know why they say that ??? If ineffective aggression equated to winning rounds then porter would have won decisively !

i guess it depends on what u were looking for

British commentators thought Porter won, before the result was announced.

Brooks own old stable mate Ryan Rhodes gave it to Porter

So you can see it wasnt clear cut as one makes out. It was a messy fight with lots of clinching and all round not good to watch.

It was no masterclass...

The ref did a very **** job

[MrRolltide91]

#bandcamp...

[frantic fighter]

No one can beat Kahn through 12 rounds ! U have to knock Kahn out to win , everyone should know this by now . Kahn's leather output per round is more than anyone out there and therefore u won't out point him . Kahn was CLEARLY robbed in DC verses Peterson . Broner doesn't have the power or countering skills to KO Kahn and therefore won't stand a chance .

I disagree with that a guy like Shawn Porter could beat Khan with a good ref because he doesn't have an inside game.Remember Peterson beat Khan by decision and Maidana almost did.