Greatest fighters with the fewest dimensions, name them

[////]

There seems to be this common assumption that fighters who come forward and knock people out are one dimensional and can't do anything else.

Coinciding with an even stranger assumption that fighters who dance backwards can do anything they want but are such "sweet science" masters that they merely choose to fool around instead and waste time.

Really anyone at the top level has a bread and butter that got them there and during the rare moments when they abandon it, the results are usually ugly.

[Beater_of_ass]

Right. So I'm right and you're wrong. When you were proven wrong you went on to a critique of his resume which has nothing to do with this thread.

Neither did your pictures but I commented on them... You're just mad because the runner can beat 3 guys coming off of losses. 2 off of KO losses.

[$£X]

Marciano. 100%.

[-PBP-]

Neither did your pictures but I commented on them... You're just mad because the runner can beat 3 guys coming off of losses. 2 off of KO losses.

Lol. Stop trolling and go get a hug.

[bojangles1987]

1970's George Foreman.

All he could do is move forward and throw vicious punches. He was such a beast that for the most part, that's all he had to do. However, if one didn't fold under power, he was screwed.

Much like Golovkin. Two guys who are exceptional at cutting off the ring and folding guys beneath their power.

If Golovkin had a career like Foreman, that would be pretty scary.

[-Johannes-]

Timothy Bradley.

I think Bradley is a different type. Like the ones who don't particularly excel in any aspect but they do everything well. He's not limited in anyway per se, he can box and he can ****,he has some power but not great, he has decent hand speed and his foot work is good. He's just not GREAT at anything except maybe having huge brass balls.

[Left Hook Tua]

I think Bradley is a different type. Like the ones who don't particularly excel in any aspect but they do everything well. He's not limited in anyway per se, he can box and he can ****,he has some power but not great, he has decent hand speed and his foot work is good. He's just not GREAT at anything except maybe having huge brass balls.

bradley is a strong puncher. he moves/marks ppl.

just not ko.

maybe he doesn't snap his punches? i dunno.

but he's strong. heard that fool use to brawl with andre ward in the ams. bradley fought at 165 i think.

[HughJass]

Bradley is very well-rounded, the problem is he doesn't excel at any one thing besides having a ton of heart and will. He's above average at almost everything.

Wtf?

Bradley and pacquaio?



Bradley is versatile. He can fight going backwards with quick in and out movement vs Marquez and going forward like he's done all of his early career vs Devon, witter, and in pocket vs PAC in rematch


Pacquaio can fight going backwards vs bigger guys and forwards

He's got boxing iq and can ****


So much misinformation in this thread

I think Bradley is a different type. Like the ones who don't particularly excel in any aspect but they do everything well. He's not limited in anyway per se, he can box and he can ****,he has some power but not great, he has decent hand speed and his foot work is good. He's just not GREAT at anything except maybe having huge brass balls.

Tut tut tut

[SplitSecond]

lol, pacquiao can't fight going backwards but floyd "oh, im pinned to the ropes again" mayweather can

dumbasses

[tjones1989]

Lol @ bradley and pac being one dimensional. You don't get to the p4p rankings by being one dimensional.