Comments Thread For: Miguel Cotto Reportedly Has Heiland on Hold if No K9

[Beater_of_ass]

i'm not double talking.

you have reading problems.

i'm pointing out cotto has the power/leverage to get fights with most fighter 147-168.

k9 isn't a mw. i suggest you look him up on that INTERNET thing you're were talking about.

Posting the same thing because you're brain can't function much more I see. My point is if Cotto picked a WW you would say he's picking on a small guy. He was talking K9 and you were saying what a joke, he's not even a MW. And yet again, you just stated 147 is fair game... I know K9 isn't a MW, who cares, because Cotto IS fighting a MW now so let me put it this way.

Cotto has a voluntary defense of a MW title and he's defending it against a ranked MW. What is the problem?

[bigjavi973]

I just read their rules, and its pathetic reading. A champion must defend against his mando at least once a year etc. However the important, and lame bit States that the WBC at its sole discretion can Grant exceptions as it wishes. In other words rubberband sold by the inch.

So it appears as if Cotto can do whatever he pleases, which leads to a question of what people think is reasonable in this instance. What do you think? GGG has been mando for god knows how long. When do you think its reasonable for him to get a shot at the title?

Do you even know how long GGG has been officially the mandatory challenger for the WBC title?

[AnimalisticMeth]

I just read their rules, and its pathetic reading. A champion must defend against his mando at least once a year etc. However the important, and lame bit States that the WBC at its sole discretion can Grant exceptions as it wishes. In other words rubberband sold by the inch.

So it appears as if Cotto can do whatever he pleases, which leads to a question of what people think is reasonable in this instance. What do you think? GGG has been mando for god knows how long. When do you think its reasonable for him to get a shot at the title?

GGG became the mando after Rubio. That was like 6 months ago. Cotto has a voluntary defense he can fight who he wants.

[Left Hook Tua]

Positive, was posted what his rankings were in another thread. I'll wait for your apology.

i'll apologize when heiland is ranked by ring magazine at 160.

i'll even settle for fat dan ESPN rankings.


did you look up k9 size, career yet, buddy?

[Left Hook Tua]

Posting the same thing because you're brain can't function much more I see. My point is if Cotto picked a WW you would say he's picking on a small guy. He was talking K9 and you were saying what a joke, he's not even a MW. And yet again, you just stated 147 is fair game... I know K9 isn't a MW, who cares, because Cotto IS fighting a MW now so let me put it this way.

Cotto has a voluntary defense of a MW title and he's defending it against a ranked MW. What is the problem?

didn't i just say i'm ok with the better names at 147-154 than these 2?

if you know k9 is not a middleweight then why did you say he was a mw?


heiland is not a ranked mw.

[Beater_of_ass]

i'll apologize when heiland is ranked by ring magazine at 160.

i'll even settle for fat dan ESPN rankings.


did you look up k9 size, career yet, buddy?

So he isn't ranked on your approved websites now... always changing the goal post, I really am done with you.

[Beater_of_ass]

didn't i just say i'm ok with the better names at 147-154 than these 2?

if you know k9 is not a middleweight then why did you say he was a mw?


heiland is not a ranked mw.

It's really good to know that Bradley/Cotto is a better fight than Cotto/Heiland because of the name value... dumbass lmao.

[Left Hook Tua]

It's really good to know that Bradley/Cotto is a better fight than Cotto/Heiland because of the name value... dumbass lmao.

it actually is.

i'd watch bradley-cotto

rios-cotto too is ok

154 not 160 for a title

[BattlingNelson]

GGG became the mando after Rubio. That was like 6 months ago. Cotto has a voluntary defense he can fight who he wants.

I thought he was mando for Martinez????

[bigjavi973]

Greatest QB of all time.

[IMG]http://media.*****.com/media/atQXlRTntnPA4/*****.gif[/IMG]

He has the MOST interceptions of all time.
Has only 30 4th quarter comebacks in 300 games. Cutler has 17 in 119 games.
Brett Favre career pass completion 62% Cutler 61.7%
Favre TD% per game: 5 Cutler: 4.7
Favre INT% per game: 3.3 Cutler: 3.4
Favre 237 yds per game Cutler: 233.2 yds per game
Favre career QB rating: 86 Cutler: 85.2
Favre has thrown less TDs than INTs 4 times. Twice he has thrown the exact same amount of INTs-TDs Cutler hasn't done that at all.