Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Kell Brook Turns Back on Khan: He's Gone For 2015

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Post
    why and what for? Khan doesn't have anything that would "capapult" brook into a fight with floyd. Especially if brook has the ibf title and floyd beats pacquaio floyd would fight brook imo to be undisputed champ at ww.
    i dont think floyd cares about being undisputed, him vs pac is way bigger than being undisputed, hell fight pac before he fights brook

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by NEETzsche View Post
      khan has made it clear that he doesn't want to fight brook for months. this statement here is simply kell finally giving up on khan
      You're right, I take that back. I forgot Khan was ducking Brook and calling out Cotto/Broner/Manny and Floyd still my mistake.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View Post
        You're right, I take that back. I forgot Khan was ducking Brook and calling out Cotto/Broner/Manny and Floyd still my mistake.
        And now Brook will be calling out Manny vs Floyd winner

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View Post
          Khan isn't a good fighter but man, he gets ducked by some big names. First Bradley and this guy thinking he has a chance at getting the Floyd/Manny winner for beating Porter lol. It actually sounds about right for a Floyd opponent though, I'm assuming Porter took Berto's spot in the Floyd sweepstakes.
          Khan isn't a good fighter? I hope you're being literal as in fighter.because he's one helluva boxer. And on a good night,he will make you look average as hell, he might even stop you.

          Comment


          • #15
            both these guys need to face top 10 opponents this year. Brook faced Porter. He gets credit for that. While Khan has yet to face a strong top 10 opponent. Alexander? Isn't even a true strong welterweight.

            All these guys need to face each other.
            Brook, Khan, Thurman, Bradley, Maidana, Porter... You can mix and match any of them.

            Though they haven't faced repeated elite competition, Thurman and Brook are most deserving of facing Floyd or PAC. Bradley had his chance against PAC,...I like to see him against these 2nd tier talents.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Rapid Counter View Post
              And now Brook will be calling out Manny vs Floyd winner
              He shouldn't be calling them out or deserving of a shot at them either. They should fight each other, if not Brook can fight Thurman and Broner can lose to Khan.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by simms601 View Post
                What fighter has ducked Khan? Bradley didn't duck Khan. He had the option to fight Manny instead of Khan, so why would he take Khan? I'm guessing if he would have taken the Khan fight, people would say he ducked Manny! Who else has turned down a fight with Khan? The rematch with Peterson was set until the whole drug testing thing came about. He could have rematche Garcia but Khan wanted the lion share of the money. Who has ducked Khan?
                Bradley fought Casamayor instead of Khan and wasn't guaranteed a Pacquiao fight. He wasn't even first choice when he did get the fight a Cotto rematch was.

                Comment


                • #18
                  They should fight each other

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by SeekDaGreat View Post
                    Khan isn't a good fighter? I hope you're being literal as in fighter.because he's one helluva boxer. And on a good night,he will make you look average as hell, he might even stop you.
                    Do all people just say this fighter could kick your ass? If I say DeMarcus Murray only had one good year and is overrated does that mean I'm better than him at football? No.

                    Khan is a B class fighter with a lot of balls, heart, speed but he has no chin and that's why he sucks. Yeah, on a good night he will kick my ass but if I land a left hook like Danny or Prescott I can put a professional fighter to sleep. Khan isn't a good fighter is maybe unfair, I consider B class fighters good fighters, just not great. His chin is so soft though, it really makes his stock worse because I can imagine him surviving against a puncher at 147 and forget about 154.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Post
                      Why and what for? Khan doesn't have anything that would "capapult" brook into a fight with floyd. Especially if brook has the IBF title and floyd beats pacquaio floyd would fight brook imo to be undisputed champ at ww.
                      Exactly correct!!!!!

                      The Brit. vs Brit. fight will always be there.

                      However, Floyd has two fights left on his contract -- Manny's got one, and Brook can have the other for the WW unification bout.

                      Khan has some demons he's avoiding. And until he faces Thurman, Porter or another top-rated contender, he should stay sidelined talking and begging instead of earning the fight he wants.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP