How do you rate Marcos Maidana?
Collapse
-
-
these floyd farts are trying so desperately to hype up maidana hahahahahahaha.
truthfully maidana was ranked #9 by ring magazine before he fought floyd (and he's still at #9). his best win is beating up overrated broner.
maidana is a tough slow moving brawler and that's it. he's no where near the skill level of guys like bradley, brook, marquez, pac, floyd, porter, thurman, khan, etc. diego chaves is far more skilled and a lot faster than maidana.Comment
-
Its going to be funny when Maidana returns and faces one of these so called 8 guys better then him in the division and he makes them quit.Comment
-
No.
But listen, lets look at rings rankings. We got a bunch of has beens and circle jerk newboies ahead of Him/
Guerrero, are you kidding? Do I even have to explain that one?
Thurman best win is Guerrero, I dont mind him being ranked up there with Maidana, based on how good hes looked, but resume wise hes ****.
Porter, **** resume got tooled by Brooke.
Brooke, wtf has he ever done but beat a guy whose best win is an old Paluie ****ing Malignaggi?
See where Im getting this at. We got all these unproven guys ahead of him when he just took Mayweather to his hardest fight in years.
Bradley is the only other guy that I would rank ahead of him other then the obvious Pac Floyd. He has a good resume and has only lost to the best. However a matchup with Maidana would be 50-50. Hes braindamaged and gets into brawls. Bradleys basically just an athletic brawler himself who can sometimes run around and work behind the jab, but he has no power to warrant respect.
Marques? Hes nothing at WW. Nothing. A shot Alvarado with some serious mental demons put him on his ass. I mean alavaorado was ****ing trying to box him and was having some succes. Marquez is too old and too small to take it from Maidana at this point.
My rankins would look like this.
Floyd
Pac
Bradley
Maidana
Brooke
Thurman
Khan
Marquez
Porter
GuerreroLast edited by Da Machine; 03-10-2015, 10:45 AM.Comment
-
He's rated around
Rios, Chaves, Guerrero, Porter
A win over career lightweight Broner... isn't strong enough to convince me that he's better than these guys.Comment
-
No.
But listen, lets look at rings rankings. We got a bunch of has beens and circle jerk newboies ahead of Him/
Guerrero, are you kidding? Do I even have to explain that one?
Thurman best win is Guerrero, I dont mind him being ranked up there with Maidana, based on how good hes looked, but resume wise hes ****.
Porter, **** resume got tooled by Brooke.
Brooke, wtf has he ever done but beat a guy whose best win is an old Paluie ****ing Malignaggi?
See where Im getting this at. We got all these unproven guys ahead of him when he just took Mayweather to his hardest fight in years.
Bradley is the only other guy that I would rank ahead of him other then the obvious Pac Floyd. He has a good resume and has only lost to the best. However a matchup with Maidana would be 50-50. Hes braindamaged and gets into brawls. Bradleys basically just an athletic brawler himself who can sometimes run around and work behind the jab, but he has no power to warrant respect.
Marques? Hes nothing at WW. Nothing. A shot Alvarado with some serious mental demons put him on his ass. I mean alavaorado was ****ing trying to box him and was having some succes. Marquez is too old and too small to take it from Maidana at this point.
My rankins would look like this.
Floyd
Pac
Bradley
Maidana
Brooke
Thurman
Khan
Marquez
Porter
GuerreroComment
-
Semi One dimensional, over achiever. Not saying that as a bad thing. He seems to have improved a bit lately.Comment
-
Comment