Errol Spence vs Leonard Bundu - April 11
Collapse
-
-
Hope Spence stops him.
I think he can do it, he's a very methodical puncher. Breaks people down over the distance. Thurman with all his explosiveness couldn't stop Bundu, hope to see Spence out-perform Thurman.Comment
-
Well, first of all, Sapyiev is a great amateur and i would love to see him in the pros.Valid point about top amateur experience. Errol Spence will have problems though not with the type of Bundu but with movers like Serik Sapiyev. Watch how ordinary Errol Spence looked against a quick top level counterpuncher with exceptional footwork, he was completely outclassed:
https://<iframe width="560" height="...reen></iframe>
But, then again, while Spence was a proficient amateur, his style is surely more well suited for the pros, he's not a stick-and-move point fighter, he's a boxer puncher who breaks people down. Sapyiev is a master stick-and-move and his style was perfect for the amateur boxing ranks, but i don't think he would do that great against Spence in a professional fight.
Just two very different universes. Just look like Golovkin fights today compared to his amateur days.Comment
-
You may be absolutely right about Sapiyev, but this is not the point I made. It's not about Sapiyev per se. I highlighted potential weaknesses in Errol that his opponents (with great footwork, timing maintained for the whole distance, and enough power to earn respect) may explore. Fortunately for him Bundu is neither of that, but I can see Errol losing UD to someone of higher calibre.Well, first of all, Sapyiev is a great amateur and i would love to see him in the pros.
But, then again, while Spence was a proficient amateur, his style is surely more well suited for the pros, he's not a stick-and-move point fighter, he's a boxer puncher who breaks people down. Sapyiev is a master stick-and-move and his style was perfect for the amateur boxing ranks, but i don't think he would do that great against Spence in a professional fight.
Just two very different universes. Just look like Golovkin fights today compared to his amateur days.
If Sapiyev ever turned pro, he would be closer to what Loma shows now, imo.Comment
-
Comment
-
I see Thurman as already established. In another thread I posted that his next fight IMO should be Bradley to determine who would be the #1 contender to fight the Floyd/Manny winner.
I see Spence maybe getting the Broner push if Broner can't show himself to be more professional.Comment
-
Lol I don't see what's so special about the guy, nothing exceptional about him whatsoever.Valid point about top amateur experience. Errol Spence will have problems though not with the type of Bundu but with movers like Serik Sapiyev. Watch how ordinary Errol Spence looked against a quick top level counterpuncher with exceptional footwork, he was completely outclassed:
https://<iframe width="560" height="...reen></iframe>
He doesn't look very fast, looks flat footed, he looks good but not great.
People just looking for a new black hope but I'm not sure he is it.Comment
-
Lol you WANT Spence to be the next big thing because you want a black American to hold the throne, I don't see anything that gives me the wow factor with Spence.
Thurman yes, he has better attributes than Spence by the looks of things, I just question his chin.Comment
-
smh. you hatin on brothas. we gotta hype up our own cuz no one else will.Comment
Comment