True or False: Guerrero beats the piss out of Broner?

[bojangles1987]

Goddammit, the myth somehow continues. How the hell do people still think Guerrero is any good?

Guerrero being any good has nothing to do with a Broner fight. Paulie Malignaggi and Emmanuel Taylor almost beat Broner, Guerrero probably would.

[The Big Dunn]

I've been killing Broner but this poll is ridiculous.

Broner may not be as good as some say or he acts, but he is far better than most on NSB say. Too much is put into his Maidana loss.

With Garcia in the corner, Maidana has become a much better fighter. That was only his 2nd time at ww, the 1st being light hitting Paulie. Given how Maidana performed against Floyd, its not surprising he beat Broner even though I and others thought Broner would beat him decisively.

Broner isn't as professional as he should be but and has not dominated as many have expected, but he has the speed, length, and has shown good boxing ability.

He would beat Ghost with less difficulty then Thurman did.

[Rip Chudd]

I think Broner could win this one. Guerrero was never really fast but he's slow as all heck at welterweight. Broner doesn't have the power to hurt him but I think he can make it a boring points victory. Then the same people saying he would lose would complain that he didn't stop Robert.

[bojangles1987]

I've been killing Broner but this poll is ridiculous.

Broner may not be as good as some say or he acts, but he is far better than most on NSB say. Too much is put into his Maidana loss.

With Garcia in the corner, Maidana has become a much better fighter. That was only his 2nd time at ww, the 1st being light hitting Paulie. Given how Maidana performed against Floyd, its not surprising he beat Broner even though I and others thought Broner would beat him decisively.

Broner isn't as professional as he should be but and has not dominated as many have expected, but he has the speed, length, and has shown good boxing ability.

He would beat Ghost with less difficulty then Thurman did.

Broner is not anywhere near good enough to beat Guerrero as easily as Thurman did, let alone do so easier. He's not good enough to beat him without a war. He hasn't looked any better since the Maidana loss than he did before.

[Daddy T]

No I think Broner would come out on top. Maidana is much more aggressive, harder hitting and dangerous than Guerrero. I think Broner wins a competitive but clear decision. guerrero may finish the stronger of the two but I think broner will have built up enough of a lead early.

[The Big Dunn]

Broner is not anywhere near good enough to beat Guerrero as easily as Thurman did, let alone do so easier. He's not good enough to beat him without a war. He hasn't looked any better since the Maidana loss than he did before.

He may have not lived up to my personal expectations or the hype, but he has won those fights either clearly or going away. That shouldn't be overlooked.

I think he easily could neutralize Ghost's output with his jabs and body punching. If Ghost makes it an ugly mess, which he certainly could, Broner would tee off on him easier than Thurman IMO, just without the power.

[Rath]

False - Broner beats Guerrero and it will be like Molina like fight.

Guerrero will fight almost like Molina.

I will cry fix and the rest will just say

Well Guerrero is not that good really although he has a granite chin or something to that effect

[HarvardBlue]

Based on what saw on Saturday Broner would have a hard time keeping Guerrero off him. This fight could easily go Guerrero's way.

I have a question. How do you prove this statement to be true or false? Shouldn't this be an opinionated question?

My bad. I thought today was my turn to be the language police.

[bojangles1987]

He may have not lived up to my personal expectations or the hype, but he has won those fights either clearly or going away. That shouldn't be overlooked.

I think he easily could neutralize Ghost's output with his jabs and body punching. If Ghost makes it an ugly mess, which he certainly could, Broner would tee off on him easier than Thurman IMO, just without the power.

He needed the 12th to clinch the win against Emmanuel Taylor. Yes, he clearly won, but only because of that round and the KD. Now Taylor isn't terrible, and I didn't criticize that fight when it was made because that's the level Broner is at. But people are still talking like he's more when he's not. That's who Adrien Broner is, a guy with good handspeed and combinations who is going to have tough fights with any top 15 fighter at 140 or 147, and lose to at least half.

He's sure as hell not as good as Thurman, and nowhere near as mobile.

[bojangles1987]

The problem is people assume it takes a Maidana to beat Adrien Broner. No, it takes a Maidana to easily beat Broner. Lesser guys are plenty capable of doing the job. Lesser fighters arguably have, and others came close.