Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Coincidence?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Boxing Fans today are EXTREMELY SENSITIVE! WHO GIVES A *** if someone think your favorite fighter is Boring, Overrated or a Hypejob.

    I think some of us just spend too much time on this forum! The world is not as technical about boxing as some of us on this forum are. They don't care or know about all the extra stuff as far as who is ducking who and who said what about this fighter. REGARDLESS OF STYLE if it is the 2 Very Best fighting each other...THE FANS WILL SHOW UP! Many of the legends in boxing would have been considered boring. I think fighters should take that as a HONOR when they get labeled BORING.

    Boring= YOUR JUST TOO GOOD FOR EVERYBODY ELSE, WHY DON'T YOU DUMB THINGS DOWN A BIT SO YOUR OPPONENT CAN HAVE A BETTER CHANCE AT BEATING YOU!

    I watch Roy Jones CARRY his opponents for rounds because the man was so gifted that he would just go out and flat out embarrass his opponents and they wouldn't be able to do anything against him and struggled to land a punch because he was so quick
    Last edited by sicko; 03-06-2015, 06:26 PM.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Salim_Shady96 View Post
      There is a strong correlation between "fans" that call fighters boring and a lack of boxing experience. I've noticed that the fans which call fighters boring tend to have never laced a pair before don't know what it feels like commiting to a punch and getting countered and as a result expect every fighter to brawl. Boxing is a tactical game and an art and you should fight to your advantages i.e Malignaggi and Algieri should not start slugging. And all boxing needs to embrace what boxing is (hit and dont get hit) and should stop calling it boring or watch another sport.
      If fighters should fight to their strengths, why should guys who are slower, but have great chins with solid power, try to outbox their opponent by "hit and not get hit"?
      Besides, "hit and not get hit" is not what boxing is about. Boxing is about winning, fighting to your strength and making your opponent adjust to your style. I'm not saying their is anything wrong with the hit and not get hit approach, I'm saying its not the only style that wins, and that has been proven every year that boxing has existed.

      Maybe you and all the other crybabies about boxing being hit and not get hit, should go watch fencing. We're trying to watch a fight here.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Salim_Shady96 View Post
        There is a strong correlation between "fans" that call fighters boring and a lack of boxing experience. I've noticed that the fans which call fighters boring tend to have never laced a pair before don't know what it feels like commiting to a punch and getting countered and as a result expect every fighter to brawl. Boxing is a tactical game and an art and you should fight to your advantages i.e Malignaggi and Algieri should not start slugging. And all boxing needs to embrace what boxing is (hit and dont get hit) and should stop calling it boring or watch another sport.
        This has been adressed 100 times now.. You don't need to have " laced them up" to know what you are watching.

        Listen, fans like what they like. Who are you to tell them they don't, or can't think a fighter is boring? It is their right as a fan. Simple **** really.

        I really hope this thread was not in defense of any specific fighter... I am sure it was though.

        PS: I have "laced them up", and respect evey aspect of the sport. You do know that purist of "boxing" tend to not like, or respect brawlers... You have noticed that, right? Same thing bruh.
        Last edited by HandSpeed303; 03-06-2015, 06:31 PM.

        Comment


        • #14
          Interesting hypothesis, where is your data to back it up.

          I have collecting data that supports my hypothesis that male fans that like boring technical fighters are more feminine and like stuff like poetry and dance.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Salim_Shady96 View Post
            There is a strong correlation between "fans" that call fighters boring and a lack of boxing experience. I've noticed that the fans which call fighters boring tend to have never laced a pair before don't know what it feels like commiting to a punch and getting countered and as a result expect every fighter to brawl. Boxing is a tactical game and an art and you should fight to your advantages i.e Malignaggi and Algieri should not start slugging. And all boxing needs to embrace what boxing is (hit and dont get hit) and should stop calling it boring or watch another sport.
            You're not allowed to bring up the fact that they are clueless having never laced 'em up.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
              Interesting hypothesis, where is your data to back it up.

              I have collecting data that supports my hypothesis that male fans that like boring technical fighters are more feminine and like stuff like poetry and dance.
              Your data is off. It's a different fight when you know exactly what you are seeing.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Rockin' View Post
                Your data is off. It's a different fight when you know exactly what you are seeing.
                Do you like poetry or dance?

                Comment


                • #18
                  Sure, cherry pick your opponent so that he is flat-footed plodder then show how you can run circles around him. So skillful ..... where do I pay for that?


                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by HandSpeed303 View Post
                    This has been adressed 100 times now.. You don't need to have " laced them up" to know what you are watching.

                    Listen, fans like what they like. Who are you to tell them they don't, or can't think a fighter is boring? It is their right as a fan. Simple **** really.

                    I really hope this thread was not in defense of any specific fighter... I am sure it was though.

                    PS: I have "laced them up", and respect evey aspect of the sport. You do know that purist of "boxing" tend to not like, or respect brawlers... You have noticed that, right? Same thing bruh.
                    I like every style of fighting, I'd never complain about a good tear up but the point I'm making is don't call fighters boring. Like whatever you want, that's ot nothing to do with me but no need to label fighters boringespecially when they put their lives on the line

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by HandSpeed303 View Post
                      This has been adressed 100 times now.. You don't need to have " laced them up" to know what you are watching.

                      Listen, fans like what they like. Who are you to tell them they don't, or can't think a fighter is boring? It is their right as a fan. Simple **** really.

                      I really hope this thread was not in defense of any specific fighter... I am sure it was though.

                      PS: I have "laced them up", and respect evey aspect of the sport. You do know that purist of "boxing" tend to not like, or respect brawlers... You have noticed that, right? Same thing bruh.


                      you're not allowed to talk about ***** because you've never been president

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP