Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official Floyd Mayweather- Manny Pacquiao Postfight aftermath discussion

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by brickcityboxing View Post
    For those of us who were sure Floyd was going to win or at least confident we also knew there would be a bunch of excuses and people living in denial some of us even mentioned suicides half joking ... Aaaaand all of that happened including the suicides. I'm not surprised at all but what does surprise me is that here we are a month later and there are still people who's sold purpose every single day is to claim PAC won, defend his injury, accuse Floyd of doping ... It's amazing the amount of time they have devoted to such a futile effort.

    I honestly saw winning a hard fought 9-3 -7-5 ish kind of fight but I knew it would be pretty clear ... What I got was better a no shadow of a doubt domination in every single scoring category, not to mention the punch stats, the same compubox stats that used to mean something when it played to PAC's favor... I could have never imagined that it would've honestly been one of Floyd's easiest fights ... And I don't think PAC's fans could've either ... Hence the butthurt.
    Lol easy okay..if running for dear life is easy yeah you have a point lol

    Btw, Floyd's compubox against Castillo was a lopsided one for Castillo. Ledderman too gave it to Castillo. So if you believe in those, I guess you have to believe Castillo won that night. You can't have it both ways buddy.

    The truth is the one who dished out the pain in the hurt game and hurt his opponent the most was Pac.

    This is after all professional boxing were pitty pat punches is not equal to heavier telling blows. Maybe if we were in the amateurs you might have a point, coz floyd ran, hugged and pitty patted his way to a running 12 rds. But they weren't in the amateurs. Pac gave the hurt in the hurt game.

    Fact. And that's with one hand. Dang!
    Last edited by Spoon23; 06-04-2015, 01:10 AM.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by brickcityboxing View Post
      For those of us who were sure Floyd was going to win or at least confident we also knew there would be a bunch of excuses and people living in denial some of us even mentioned suicides half joking ... Aaaaand all of that happened including the suicides. I'm not surprised at all but what does surprise me is that here we are a month later and there are still people who's sold purpose every single day is to claim PAC won, defend his injury, accuse Floyd of doping ... It's amazing the amount of time they have devoted to such a futile effort.

      I honestly saw winning a hard fought 9-3 -7-5 ish kind of fight but I knew it would be pretty clear ... What I got was better a no shadow of a doubt domination in every single scoring category, not to mention the punch stats, the same compubox stats that used to mean something when it played to PAC's favor... I could have never imagined that it would've honestly been one of Floyd's easiest fights ... And I don't think PAC's fans could've either ... Hence the butthurt.
      In no way was it a "domination in every single scoring category" absolute nonsense!

      Floyd barely landed clean in the whole fight! Hence the pitiful gifs and highlights showcasing this "dominance" nothing Floyd did in the whole fight was as significant as my sig! Fact!

      Neither fighter really did much of anything, but I understand in Flowemoe land biased American judges see this as "dominating, controlling the pace".

      In what sense was it easy for Floyd? Because he didn't take much punishment? Aren't you supposed to win a fight by landing punches? You could argue the same for Pac, he didn't take much punishment and it was one of his "easiest" fights too by your definition.

      It's similar to the Bradley fight, one of the judges (probably influenced by the "he's a black American so he's slick doe" stereotype) said Bradley was outboxing Pac and the guy stereotyped as being reckless (PAC) wasn't getting the credit he deserved for his defence.

      And to top it off it's apparent Pac was injured, you can see what looks to be internal bleeding on his shoulder blade and Floyd was clearly yanking his right arm. For a handicapped opponent the performance really wasn't too impressive.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
        Lol easy okay..if running for dear life is easy yeah you have a point lol

        Btw, Floyd's compubox against Castillo was a lopsided one for Castillo. Ledderman too gave it to Castillo. So if you believe in those, I guess you have to believe Castillo won that night. You can't have it both ways buddy.

        The truth is the one who dished out the pain in the hurt game and hurt his opponent the most was Pac.

        This is after all professional boxing were pitty pat punches is not equal to heavier telling blows. Maybe if we were in the amateurs you might have a point, coz floyd ran, hugged and pitty patted his way to a running 12 rds. But they weren't in the amateurs. Pac gave the hurt in the hurt game.

        Fact. And that's with one hand. Dang!
        Ok, cool so using your logic if because Lederman had the Castillo fight for Castillo and compubox had him out landing and out throwing Floyd and you claim Castillo won the fight based on that... Then you should say the same about Floyd beating PAC right?

        I have no problem saying it ... The Castillo fight has no basis on this fight. Castillo won... Now moving on... Pacquiao lost ... How's that sound?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Hype job View Post
          In no way was it a "domination in every single scoring category" absolute nonsense!

          Floyd barely landed clean in the whole fight! Hence the pitiful gifs and highlights showcasing this "dominance" nothing Floyd did in the whole fight was as significant as my sig! Fact!

          Neither fighter really did much of anything, but I understand in Flowemoe land biased American judges see this as "dominating, controlling the pace".

          In what sense was it easy for Floyd? Because he didn't take much punishment? Aren't you supposed to win a fight by landing punches? You could argue the same for Pac, he didn't take much punishment and it was one of his "easiest" fights too by your definition.

          It's similar to the Bradley fight, one of the judges (probably influenced by the "he's a black American so he's slick doe" stereotype) said Bradley was outboxing Pac and the guy stereotyped as being reckless (PAC) wasn't getting the credit he deserved for his defence.

          And to top it off it's apparent Pac was injured, you can see what looks to be internal bleeding on his shoulder blade and Floyd was clearly yanking his right arm. For a handicapped opponent the performance really wasn't too impressive.
          Floyd outlanded pacquiao by almost double in the fight ... Your right in order to win you have to land... He landed two times the amount that's pretty clear cut! In what scoring category could you say pacquiao was superior to Floyd in that fight? I'll wait for you to google the actual categories and then come up with some weak argument to give him credit for one of them. We can take ring generalship,defense and punches landed right off the board... Your move

          Comment


          • PAC beat this fraud

            Comment


            • Originally posted by jas View Post
              PAC beat this fraud
              You know you don't believe that...

              Comment


              • Originally posted by brickcityboxing View Post
                You know you don't believe that...
                Pacquiao with a full training camp and no injuries would have beaten that Fraud.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by brickcityboxing View Post
                  Ok, cool so using your logic if because Lederman had the Castillo fight for Castillo and compubox had him out landing and out throwing Floyd and you claim Castillo won the fight based on that... Then you should say the same about Floyd beating PAC right?

                  I have no problem saying it ... The Castillo fight has no basis on this fight. Castillo won... Now moving on... Pacquiao lost ... How's that sound?
                  Lol that's your logic not mine. You hyping compubox when we know clearly its not really a computer but a man who clicks the number of punch connects. Very subjective, hence Castillo had a very huge and glaring compubox stats compared to Floyd that night and still Floyd won. Go figure.. Now your hyping same compubox and you think it's the truth. As I said you can't have it both ways. If you believe in compubox then you have to believe Castillo won that night coz punch stats was clearly his.

                  And thanks for saying Castillo won that night, coz he really did.

                  And for the record I don't believe in compubox.

                  What you should be thinking about is if you believe in compubox why is it that a 2 handed healthy Floyd has almost the same punch out put as a one handed Pac, and has his lowest career punch output in his entire career. To me that tells a chunk of the story of this lackluster fight.

                  No one won that night. It's was a black eye for boxing. That said..

                  46-2 baby!
                  Last edited by Spoon23; 06-04-2015, 03:08 AM.

                  Comment


                  • Had Manny fought Floyd as hard as his fans are fighting the truth he might have actually won.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
                      Had Manny fought Floyd as hard as his fans are fighting the truth he might have actually won.
                      Lmfao. Ouch!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP