Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official Floyd Mayweather- Manny Pacquiao Postfight aftermath discussion

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 19 tests and not a single video?

    saline solution?

    retroactive clause?

    REEKS

    Comment


    • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
      This is not aimed at you, but of course the point to be made to Rath would be would USADA risk their reputation by playing along with faking drug tests for Floyd's sake?

      Just expressing how faulty his logic is with the no video, no testing. No video, no injury?
      oh the USADA who throws samples of positive results?

      or the 3 positive Floyd samples?

      yeah they are the epitome of unblemished reputation

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Rath View Post
        oh the USADA who throws samples of positive results?

        or the 3 positive Floyd samples?

        yeah they are the epitome of unblemished reputation
        3 positive Floyd samples? Proof?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
          3 positive Floyd samples? Proof?
          Floyd paid Pac undisclosed amount when asked about that result.

          was that proof not enough for you?

          now show me videos of Floyd being randomly drug tested by USADA.

          i am sure you can not.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Rath View Post
            Floyd paid Pac undisclosed amount when asked about that result.

            was that proof not enough for you?

            now show me videos of Floyd being randomly drug tested by USADA.

            i am sure you can not.
            He settled the libel case out of court. Please educate yourself. You know damn well that if Mayweather failed tests, he would be crucified.



            By the way, where is the video of Pac hurting that shoulder?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
              He settled the libel case out of court. Please educate yourself. You know damn well that if Mayweather failed tests, he would be crucified.



              By the way, where is the video of Pac hurting that shoulder?
              Floyd settled the suit, because Pac wants to see those 3 positive blood samples.

              Educate yourself you say

              The surgery was the proof.

              thought you got me?

              now show me those videos and quit dilly dallying.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Rath View Post
                Floyd settled the suit, because Pac wants to see those 3 positive blood samples.

                Educate yourself you say

                The surgery was the proof.

                thought you got me?

                now show me those videos and quit dilly dallying.
                Oh, is that what happened because you said so? Did you look at that video?

                Do you have a video of the surgery, home boy? All I see is a sling.

                I don't have to "get you." Mayweather gotcha punk a$$. You still mad?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by JoeKidd View Post
                  There are excuses and there are explanations. Pacquiao had to explain why the punch output was low. Fans want to know things like why Bradley stopped popping and moving. Doesn't change the judges' decision. Fans have the subjective right to take whatever they want of all the facts.
                  Yup, the explanation tells us that yes, the judges awarded the win for floyd.

                  But it will never change the fact that, on that night Floyd fought a 50% pac. Nothing to be proud about really. He had a hard time with a handicapped southpaw.

                  No bragging rights there. Even uncle Roger Mayweather wants to settle the score, coz he knows his nephew didnt prove jack. Fighting a one armed fighter doesnt count.

                  The worst part is to most they think Floyd drew with Pac and to some PAc won with one hand.

                  As I said, nothing lost nothing gained in that fight except Floyd's and PAc's pockets.
                  Last edited by Spoon23; 05-26-2015, 10:52 AM.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
                    Yup, the explanation tells us that yes, the judges awarded the win for floyd.

                    But it will never change the fact that, in that night Floyd fought a 60% pac. Nothing to be proud about really. He had a hard time with a handicap southpaw.

                    No bragging rights there. Even uncle Roger Mayweather wants to settle the score, coz he knows his nephew didnt prove jack. Fighting a one armed fighter doesnt count.

                    The worst part is to most they think Floyd drew with Pac and to some PAc won with one hand.

                    As I said, nothing lost nothing gained in that fight except Floyd's and PAc's pockets.
                    Your story is changing now, son. First you said most thought Pac won, and now I see you're saying most thought pac drew and some thought he won. lol. The funny part is that you're still wrong, but it's funny watching you slowly come back to reality. Still got a long way to go tho, broham.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                      Oh, is that what happened because you said so? Did you look at that video?

                      Do you have a video of the surgery, home boy? All I see is a sling.

                      I don't have to "get you." Mayweather gotcha punk a$$. You still mad?
                      i knew you would say that.

                      i will provide you with the video of the surgery if you could provide me with videos of Floyd being randomly drug tested starting from mosley to pac.

                      Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

                      Floyd fans and their logic

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP