I can argue that Maidana, Oscar, Cotto, Hatton and Castillo all did better against Floyd then Pac did.
I can argue that Floyd is just on a higher skill level than Pac is.
Being the aggressor (following your opponent around and then getting check-left-hooked flush), is actually NOT part of the judging criteria. THAT is not arguable.
I can argue that Floyd is just on a higher skill level than Pac is.
Being the aggressor (following your opponent around and then getting check-left-hooked flush), is actually NOT part of the judging criteria. THAT is not arguable.
Comment