Fight contracts Splits decided on outcome

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HanzGruber
    STRAPMEUP
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2011
    • 29824
    • 1,069
    • 238
    • 81,632

    #11
    because thats ******ed and gives judges or promoter even more incentive to rob someone

    Comment

    • Funky_Monk
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2008
      • 1698
      • 52
      • 5
      • 8,368

      #12
      Originally posted by Public_Enemy
      Bradley/Pacquiao I
      Rios/Abril
      De la Hoya/Sturm

      The list goes on and on. Purse should be based on accomplishments combined with popularity/drawing power. The right guy doesn't always get the decision in boxing but he shouldn't lose his a part of his purse because of the judges incompetence.
      That's a difference issue. Don't blur contracts with judges.

      Comment

      • Funky_Monk
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2008
        • 1698
        • 52
        • 5
        • 8,368

        #13
        Originally posted by HanzGruber
        because thats ******ed and gives judges or promoter even more incentive to rob someone
        It's true that it lends to more corruption potentially.
        Having said that every other sport I can think of earnings are based on outcome.
        Exception might be marathon runners who sometimes get paid to enter but often it's topped up if they win

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP