Which is a better drug tester. USADA or VADA?

[Pac=Duran]

USADA is dodgy as ****, covered for Lance Armstrong for years and I assume they are very corrupt.

VADA has never really caught anyone lol. Which drug tester is better?

[V.WEBB]

Whatever Manny uses is legit.

Whatever Floyd uses isn't.

End thread.

[SterlingStained]

i prefer NADA.

ped use is the next step in human evolution.

to deny ped use is to deny human progress.

[ИATAS]

This is what we've come to huh?

[sicko]

Whatever Manny uses is legit.

Whatever Floyd uses isn't.

End thread.

Yeah on this forum that is exactly how they pick when it comes to polls like this

[stovepipe]

USADA is dodgy as ****, covered for Lance Armstrong for years and I assume they are very corrupt.

VADA has never really caught anyone lol. Which drug tester is better?

Vada never caught anyone? WTF?

http://www.boxingscene.com/andre-berto-fails-vada-test-positive-nandrolone--53001

[Cut Man]

VADA

Ask Timothy Bradley

[stovepipe]

USADA is dodgy as ****, covered for Lance Armstrong for years and I assume they are very corrupt.

VADA has never really caught anyone lol. Which drug tester is better?

you need to change the BS in the opening post VADA is not used because its a legit clean company that catches cheaters, in addition to catching Berto...

http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id...manny-pacquiao


http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id...led-urine-test

[Beercules]

Vada is número uno.

[bigfo0t]

I'll go with the one that doesn't reek of corruption.

USADA - known for DESTROYING samples (wtf? why?), notifying only the fighter/promoter and NOT the commission of positive results (lol. just lol). Also costs like 5 times more than VADA where the fk does that money go? to keep people hush hush?