Comments Thread For: Amir Khan: I'd Fight Miguel Cotto at 155 in a Heartbeat!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #121
    Originally posted by Heavyfist
    Only a dumb fug would criticize Khans resume and bring up those fighters.

    Does Thurman, Brook or Porter have better resumes than Khan? None of those fighters do. Yet you bring them up? By your ******ed logic, none of those guys have earned a shot at Khan.

    This is the exact time of ******ed NSB poster who will engage in mental gymnastics to arrive at idiotic conclusions. This kind of inane nitpicking, anyone can do for any fighter. I wouldn't bother with these sorts of bugs Dirk.

    Also why leave out Alexander? Quite ******ed.

    The fact is Khan is in for some huge fights. Schooling Collazo and Alexander made that possible. Made him worthy. Pacquiao, Mayweather, R Mayweather, R Garcia, the boxing media world and the community all agree.

    Who cares what this low life dumb a$$ thinks?
    I asked him to name some fighters who have better resumes than Khan at his age of 27. Still haven't heard. I'm sure there are some but he acts like Khan has a horrible resume so I'm wondering whose is better.

    Comment

    • Heavyfist
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2014
      • 1122
      • 77
      • 1
      • 7,304

      #122
      Khan won the Diaz fight. Who cares if it was close? Porter drew with him, and in reality lost. Khan was still shaking off a loss, and learning with Hunter, and now is in full swing. Only a seriously dumb person would not realize this. And again, he won.

      Who cares about Diaz, Khan just whopped Alexander by a quantum leap better, than Bradley, Maidana and Matthyse. By the ******ed circular logic of bluebeam, since that is Khan latest performance he is clearly better than those fighters. Case closed.

      Comment

      • bluebeam
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 3839
        • 121
        • 0
        • 31,012

        #123
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
        Well obviously he put up a good performance against Porter in a fight many observers thought he won so he had more than enough left to be a legitimate challenge to Khan.

        You wanted Khan to fight Porter but you discredit Khan for fighting the guy that most thought beat Porter? Strange. Are you confused mate?

        I didn't say I wanted khan too fight porter. im saying porter and any other fighter in their prime would suffice. but you keep making excuses for khan. he has too fight again vey soon.

        my guess. chris algeiri

        Comment

        • bluebeam
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 3839
          • 121
          • 0
          • 31,012

          #124
          Originally posted by Heavyfist
          Khan won the Diaz fight. Who cares if it was close? Porter drew with him, and in reality lost. Khan was still shaking off a loss, and learning with Hunter, and now is in full swing. Only a seriously dumb person would not realize this. And again, he won.

          Who cares about Diaz, Khan just whopped Alexander by a quantum leap better, than Bradley, Maidana and Matthyse. By the ******ed circular logic of bluebeam, since that is Khan latest performance he is clearly better than those fighters. Case closed.

          but he didn't do it better than porter. who stepped in for khan in the first place

          Comment

          • Dirk Diggler UK
            Deleted
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 48836
            • 1,312
            • 693
            • 58,902

            #125
            Originally posted by bluebeam
            I didn't say I wanted khan too fight porter. im saying porter and any other fighter in their prime would suffice. but you keep making excuses for khan. he has too fight again vey soon.

            my guess. chris algeiri
            So why did Porter - "a fighter in his prime" - go life n death and arguably lose to Diaz whose best days were left in 2007 apparently?

            Weird.

            Comment

            • bluebeam
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2009
              • 3839
              • 121
              • 0
              • 31,012

              #126
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
              I asked him to name some fighters who have better resumes than Khan at his age of 27. Still haven't heard. I'm sure there are some but he acts like Khan has a horrible resume so I'm wondering whose is better.

              canelo has wins over trout and lara are better wins than any on khans resume

              Garcia's win over matthysse and your boy are better than any wins on khans resume.

              khan best win is maidana.

              Comment

              • alexguiness
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2012
                • 8169
                • 396
                • 44
                • 50,607

                #127
                Khan has beaten the mighty Collazo, Diaz and Molina.

                He took LWW Devon to school.

                Now he is the next great thing at LMW?

                GTFO

                Khan has beaten a relevant fighter at 147 apart from Alexander who is in reality at LWW.

                When is Khan going to give Cotto a deadline lol?

                Comment

                • bluebeam
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 3839
                  • 121
                  • 0
                  • 31,012

                  #128
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                  So why did Porter - "a fighter in his prime" - go life n death and arguably lose to Diaz whose best days were left in 2007 apparently?

                  Weird.

                  so you never seen a prime fighter go life and death with a washed up fighter before huh?

                  and you are just making the alexander win for khan look even worst. because porter bullied alexander a year before khan beat him. and you keep telling me how the world feels diaz beat porter so what does that say about khan's win over alexander? since the same alexander got his ass whooped by porter before khan had the balls too fight him.

                  Comment

                  • Heavyfist
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Aug 2014
                    • 1122
                    • 77
                    • 1
                    • 7,304

                    #129
                    Its funny how Alexander is a legit and huge and important opponent for Brook.

                    But when Khan absolutely schools the living shlt out of the same opponent, Alexander is suddenly a bum. No one had man handled Collazo the way Khan did.

                    Some people wondered how good Collazo still was, but he'd just koed Ortiz and was considered back. He'd always been tricky, regardless, Khan stepped it up against Alexander.

                    Khan again schooled Alexander better than anyone previously. And now? Those same people are simply ignoring this fight, like it never happened, like somebody secretly lobotomized them. Sorry you can't just ignore the Alexander fight, the fact Khan dominated him.

                    If you're as good as your last fight as so many here have suggested, Khan is right on top of the world right now. Thankfully the boxing world agrees and Khan is up for the big fights.

                    Comment

                    • VG_Addict
                      king meat's twin
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jun 2012
                      • 5618
                      • 237
                      • 3
                      • 53,380

                      #130
                      Originally posted by Heavyfist
                      Its funny how Alexander is a legit and huge and important opponent for Brook.

                      But when Khan absolutely schools the living shlt out of the same opponent, Alexander is suddenly a bum. No one had man handled Collazo the way Khan did.

                      Some people wondered how good Collazo still was, but he'd just koed Ortiz and was considered back. He'd always been tricky, regardless, Khan stepped it up against Alexander.

                      Khan again schooled Alexander better than anyone previously. And now? Those same people are simply ignoring this fight, like it never happened, like somebody secretly lobotomized them. Sorry you can't just ignore the Alexander fight, the fact Khan dominated him.

                      If you're as good as your last fight as so many here have suggested, Khan is right on top of the world right now. Thankfully the boxing world agrees and Khan is up for the big fights.
                      Collazo has way past his best when Khan fought him.

                      You have no credibility. You said Khan would beat Thurman.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP