You didn't say Hearns beat a very good version or Cuevas, you said "Cuevas had a weak chin", verbatim so yes, you ARE trolling. Saying a guy has a weak chin because he was stopped by a concussing puncher like Hearns is daft. You said it, it is there to see. Sorry but your "wave length" is not up to par as evident by your "what I meant" statement which had absolutely nothing to do with what you actually wrote. That was a copout followed by a defensive statement about wave length which makes you sound desperate to defend an obvious statement you made which requires no interpretation. If you expect to genuinely contribute to these boards, you need to stop trolling.
Ask me ANY question about boxing. Any question boxing related.
Collapse
-
Comment
-
who was the biggest ducker in the year 1899????
dont show your face until you answer this question.
thanks in advance.Comment
-
Both are true ring warriors. I got respect for both but Liles never achieved the sheer peak of Tates. Tates was elite level, Liles was good but never quite up there. I gotta go with Tates due to more longevity, tougher opponents and better skills (eye test).Comment
-
Boxing was nowhere near as wide spread at that time and there was no use of media. But if I had to pick a ducker? Probably some White Guy since they never fought the Black Champions.Comment
-
So what's your point again? I'm sorry so can we go back to the original topic. Your point was that Cuevas would beat Margarito right? He wouldn't. End discussion.You didn't say Hearns beat a very good version or Cuevas, you said "Cuevas had a weak chin", verbatim so yes, you ARE trolling. Saying a guy has a weak chin because he was stopped by a concussing puncher like Hearns is daft. You said it, it is there to see. Sorry but your "wave length" is not up to par as evident by your "what I meant" statement which had absolutely nothing to do with what you actually wrote. That was a copout followed by a defensive statement about wave length which makes you sound desperate to defend an obvious statement you made which requires no interpretation. If you expect to genuinely contribute to these boards, you need to stop trolling.Comment
-
This is a question and answer thread. This isn't a 'question/debate/answer' thread. You wanna start a debate? Create your own thread. You got a boxing question? Ask me.Typing from a cell phone!
and your opinion, and credibility holds up as much as a bucket with holes at the bottom!
I've read the b.s. that your selling, and I'm not buying it.
I see one person called you out, and I'll be the 2nd!
Was this a clear enough for you?
Is this the "Queen's English I just typed? or do you have another excuse to perpetrate a fraudulent act of boxing knowledge???
Comment
-
It's not a joke since I'm actually answering all boxing related questions in at least debatable paragraphs. I'm not just giving one line answers or answers with no logic. I'm actually giving real legitimate answers.
A 'joke thread' would be.
'Where you rank Wladimir Klitshcko'?
'Glass jaw bum'
See that's a joke thread.Comment
-
My first point is that Cuevas did not have a weak chin and then you skated, and my second point is that Margarito was susceptible to getting busted up by guys with solid lefts and swelled up by guys who did not hit nearly as hard as Cuevas. Margarito would have been bludgeoned by a man who proved his championship level with 11 title defenses. End of discussion.Comment
Comment