So no Rigo-LSC fight???

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bullrider
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2011
    • 5328
    • 518
    • 137
    • 13,616

    #81
    That's why LSC should refrain from mentioning names from now on. He should know by now that fights don't just happen. You make them happen. If he and Haymon are not in sync, what's the point of calling out names? And who exactly are you addressing when you mention names? Is it not Haymon? So why don't you tell him? Who exactly do you expect to make these fights for you? Ellerbe?

    Comment

    • Dirk Diggler UK
      Deleted
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 48836
      • 1,312
      • 693
      • 58,902

      #82
      Originally posted by KRAFTSMAN
      That's why LSC should refrain from mentioning names from now on. He should know by now that fights don't just happen. You make them happen. If he and Haymon are not in sync, what's the point of calling out names? And who exactly are you addressing when you mention names? Is it not Haymon? So why don't you tell him? Who exactly do you expect to make these fights for you? Ellerbe?
      He only name drops people to save face and try to dupe dumb ass Mexicans into thinking he actually wants to fight these people.

      Every few months, he changes the name of who he wants to fight. First it was Frampton....then Quigg....then Rigo....then back to Frampton then back to Rigo. All the while he has no intention of fighting any of them and fights taco vendors instead.

      Comment

      • ThePrince
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2010
        • 5877
        • 364
        • 49
        • 12,832

        #83
        Bob Arum doe.

        Comment

        • Bullrider
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2011
          • 5328
          • 518
          • 137
          • 13,616

          #84
          Any response from the Santa Cruz camp yet? Is it confirmed that Haymon is blocking the fight? I mean do you accept that these Haymon fighters are virtually powerless when it comes to choosing their next opponent? Or it's just a convenient excuse?

          Comment

          • SCEN3RY
            Kingslayer
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2010
            • 3425
            • 167
            • 156
            • 21,244

            #85
            Originally posted by KRAFTSMAN
            Any response from the Santa Cruz camp yet? Is it confirmed that Haymon is blocking the fight? I mean do you accept that these Haymon fighters are virtually powerless when it comes to choosing their next opponent? Or it's just a convenient excuse?
            It can't be confirmed, but this whole "don't blame Haymon" crap is comical. When these fighters say "it's up to my manager Al Haymon," it means he has influence on them. He plays the role of manager, adviser, and now a promoter. He has smart people in his employ and matchmakers that surely convey their thoughts to him. His influence among his fighters is not to be overlooked, but if the fighter is displeased with the competition he's facing they could say something about it. These fights are mutually decided imo.

            Besides, LSC-Rigo isn't a fight that favors his man, I can't recall the last time Haymon dealt with another manager/promoter unless his money guy was almost sure to win (I suppose Loma-Russell, but that was ordered by some sanctioning body)

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP