Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Accurately updated Miguel Cotto's Wikipedia

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Accurately updated Miguel Cotto's Wikipedia

    EDIT: BIGJAVI973 TRIED TO REDIT COTTO'S PAGE AND HAS NOW RUINED IT ENTIRELY. EVERYONE THANK BIGJAVI973

    Well, just his win over Martinez which did not mention ANYTHING about Martinez' knee and how it hindered his performance. Had I not edited you would think the knee was of no circumstance. That's dishonest and not fair. It's funny though, had Cotto suffered a cut or something it would have totally been in the description of the fight. Martinez DRAGGING his knee through the ring wasn't worthy enough to be mentioned though. Disgust at whichever of you stans wrote that.

    Anyways, I also added a small segment on the Canelo negotiations. Kept it 100% too. If you feel a fighter's history and/or record is dishonest head to that wiki page and do something about it brah!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miguel_Cotto#Middleweight
    Last edited by Agent Mulder; 02-03-2015, 12:21 PM. Reason: bigjavi is an idiot

  • #2
    So you came to brag about being childish on the internet?

    Comment


    • #3

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by titan m View Post
        So you came to brag about being childish on the internet?
        I guess so Stanley. I wonder if you consider everyone who edits, posts, corrects and adds citations on Wikipedia "childish".

        Comment


        • #5
          So the fact that Martinez was moving around 100% fine until he got clipped by the left hook had no effect on his legs turning to jelly? Lol, just an excuse.

          Comment


          • #6
            Boom!

            You see what I did there? I just made your ****ing thread dope!

            You spent more time documenting Sergio Martinez and hypothesizing his ineffectiveness than you did detailing the fight as a whole and Cotto's disciplined performance during the fight.

            But hey, whatever, have a nice day...

            Comment


            • #7
              lmao some of u cats on here are hilarious

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Hyacinth View Post
                I guess so Stanley. I wonder if you consider everyone who edits, posts, corrects and adds citations on Wikipedia "childish".
                No, just the ones who look to discredit somebody by typing in nonsense. Look at any fight in history and you can come up with an excuse as to why the loser lost and take credit away from the winner. Plus look at your sig, guys like you who spend their days insulting or trying to discredit a guy because you're not a fan come off as childish to me, just my opinion though.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by SCEN3RY View Post
                  Boom!

                  You see what I did there? I just made your ****ing thread dope!

                  You spent more time documenting Sergio Martinez and hypothesizing his ineffectiveness than you did detailing the fight as a whole and Cotto's disciplined performance during the fight.

                  But hey, whatever, have a nice day...
                  Actually, I didn't remove anything at all. It was exactly as it is except without any mention on Sergios condition. If there isn't enough Cotto stanning in that segment that's not my fault at all. Thanks for that pic though Breh

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Lol but before the fight you likely said Cotto would get whooped.

                    Like many others.

                    Then the excuses rained in. Cotto is so irrationally hated on here.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP