compared to a resume where the fights at the top of the resume are losses?
you are deluded if you think experts and historians are going to think froch the best SMW of this era. absolutely deluded. there's no reason to even joke about it further.
What kind of moron judges a fighter solely on his losses. This post takes reaching to new levels........
Just my opinion but I think Benn was the hardest hitter
great video of the dark destroyer doing what he does best
benn who said he is ready to die in the ring was bludgeoned and quit twice against irish stevie Collins. after he saw he could not hurt him faked an ankle injury like david haye did. stevie Collins moved UP form middleweight to beat eubank the egomaniacal psycho twice . benn being a bully and used to guys going down could not hurt the middleweight Collins so he quit twice
Carl froch's resume is light years better than ward's. Bar none. Froch is the best opponent on wards resume. Bar none. Froch's fought everyone he was supposed to. Froch is a true fighter. Can't recollect him ever ducking or dodging anyone.
Never thought of Kessler as being an elite puncher. Thought he had elite timing though in his prime and very very good power. But maybe. Cool shout from Barker.
Carl froch's resume is light years better than ward's. Bar none. Froch is the best opponent on wards resume. Bar none. Froch's fought everyone he was supposed to. Froch is a true fighter. Can't recollect him ever ducking or dodging anyone.
Carl froch's resume is light years better than ward's. Bar none. Froch is the best opponent on wards resume. Bar none. Froch's fought everyone he was supposed to. Froch is a true fighter. Can't recollect him ever ducking or dodging anyone.
Well he has been reluctant to pursue a return with Ward and has refused to back up his promise on a decider against Kessler.
Kessler on the other hand, has never ducked anyone. He has called out GGG, Ward, Froch but nobody wants none.
Comment