rios alvarado 3 was horrible? anyone agree?
Collapse
-
Rios was in better shape, showed more head movement and used jab and decent footwork. I thought he showed great improvement since their last fight and looking forward to seeing him against a decent opponent.that was a horrible fight.
rios is still the same.
its his opposition that's different.
it sux to watch a boxer who doesnt even wanna be there get beat up like that.
although it wouldve been a ****** fight even if alvarado did fight back, its a match waiting for brain damage to happen.......Comment
-
To the op:
Yes it was effing awful. Mile high mike looked beyond bad, they said he showed up much later than Rios; probably busy smoking meth. He looked hurt by every shot, didn't throw anything back. I don't blame Rios tho he definitely showed up prepared.Comment
-
Not surprising the Brits have been duped by Audley and David Haye for years
The fight was anticlimactic for sure. Rios came well prepared and as a result had an easy fight against an unmotivated foe - Rios deserves credit for that.
Also, I detected something off from Mike during the prefight interview with Lampley - to me it looked like was high on kind of drugComment
-
it was the perfect idea. the 3rd fight was designed too rejuvenate the career of the winner in a fight of the year candidate.
it didn't live up too the fight of the year hype, because Alvarado didn't prepare.
but it served its purpose of reviving the winner.
now rios is gonna get a better fight with possibly marquez or bradleyComment
-
i streamed online hahahahaha.
yeah but... how hard is it to do what he did (given his level of profession) against someone who earmuffed and threw nothing back :/...
yes, to clarify things, i DO NOT BLAME RIOS either.
its just such a ****ty pointless fight...
horri**** >_>
top rank and their trilogy games.
nobdoy even wanted to see this **** and they tried to sell us this.Comment
-
Comment
Comment