Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Video: Bernard Hopkins on Going To 168, Fighting Froch

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Froch would be facing the ghost of Calzaghe also in a bout with Hopkins. Would he risk losing to an even OLDER Hopkins than the one Joe beat nearly 10 yrs ago?!

    For the sake of comparing legacies Froch shouldn't even consider this fight. I imagine Joe Cal would have a little chuckle of satisfaction at Froch fighting Hopkins at the age of 50 lol especially if he loses oh God!!

    Comment


    • #12
      B-Hop hasn't beat a legit top guy in 4 years, he certainly won't beat Froch.

      Bernard is legendary, but Froch is no Cloud, Murat or Shumenov.

      Froch via wide UD.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by texasboi15 View Post
        Froch would be facing the ghost of Calzaghe also in a bout with Hopkins. Would he risk losing to an even OLDER Hopkins than the one Joe beat nearly 10 yrs ago?!

        For the sake of comparing legacies Froch shouldn't even consider this fight. I imagine Joe Cal would have a little chuckle of satisfaction at Froch fighting Hopkins at the age of 50 lol especially if he loses oh God!!
        Yea the fight won't happen

        It's just Hopkins throwing it out there

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by gmc_rfc_06 View Post
          B-Hop hasn't beat a legit top guy in 4 years, he certainly won't beat Froch.

          Bernard is legendary, but Froch is no Cloud, Murat or Shumenov.

          Froch via wide UD.
          Athletic fighters beat Hopkins

          Froch isn't athletic

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by jas View Post
            Athletic fighters beat Hopkins

            Froch isn't athletic
            Anyone with high work rate can beat Hopkins. Its laughable that you even think that Hopkins would stand a chance against Froch.

            Comment


            • #16
              froch would beat him , hopkins is done. froch isnt far off but he surely has more in the tank than hopkins

              Comment


              • #17
                Unbelievable to read some of the comments oh here insulting Hopkins the living legend. No respect at all. Hopkins can beat Froch at 50.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by jas View Post
                  Athletic fighters beat Hopkins

                  Froch isn't athletic
                  Kovalev isn't any more 'athletic' than Froch.

                  At this stage, top guys can beat Hopkins with work rate.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Why not Ward?
                    WTF
                    They treat this guy like he has Ebola

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by gmc_rfc_06 View Post
                      Kovalev isn't any more 'athletic' than Froch.

                      At this stage, top guys can beat Hopkins with work rate.
                      Yea he is. .

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP