Comments Thread For: Khan: If No Mayweather, I Can Target Bradley or Marquez
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Didn't realise you needed an "excuse" to target more highly regarded fighters.
95% of people on here are ***ing idiots so I wouldn't brag about that mate.Comment
-
I wasn't talking about Khan making excuses, I was talking about you making them. As if you'd rather see Khan fighting those two guys for no belt rather than Brook at Wembley which would be a huge event in comparison. It's obvious he doesn't want to risk his career by fighting Kell but you won't admit it. It's that simple.Comment
-
It's not about what I want to see. I actually would prefer Khan-Bradley if you want my honest opinion. That fight has been sticking in my craw since 2011. I'm a fan of both Khan and Brook so seeing them fight each other isn't as thrilling to me as you'd think.I wasn't talking about Khan making excuses, I was talking about you making them. As if you'd rather see Khan fighting those two guys for no belt rather than Brook at Wembley which would be a huge event in comparison. It's obvious he doesn't want to risk his career by fighting Kell but you won't admit it. It's that simple.
Risk his career? LOL....settle down. You need to get your head out your arse. Brook-Khan is big in the UK but not worldwide. Khan gets far more exposure fighting a Marquez or a Bradley in America. It puts him in line for the super fights he wants.
Kell Brook is an absolute nobody outside of the UK - ****, he isn't even that big in the UK. If Khan beat him, Mayweather would be like "so what....who's Kell Brook?". Other than the payday, it doesn't really do anything for Khan's career aspirations.Comment
-
Mayweathers not going to fight Khan anyway and he won't get a bigger 'super fight' than fighting Brook. And you go on about exposure, Froch Groves 2 did 900.000 during the day on HBO. And Khans known more than both of those two in America so it would do a mill plus over there easy. So stop coming with these BS excuses, it's always the same ****** s*it.It's not about what I want to see. I actually would prefer Khan-Bradley if you want my honest opinion. That fight has been sticking in my craw since 2011. I'm a fan of both Khan and Brook so seeing them fight each other isn't as thrilling to me as you'd think.
Risk his career? LOL....settle down. You need to get your head out your arse. Brook-Khan is big in the UK but not worldwide. Khan gets far more exposure fighting a Marquez or a Bradley in America. It puts him in line for the super fights he wants.
Kell Brook is an absolute nobody outside of the UK - ****, he isn't even that big in the UK. If Khan beat him, Mayweather would be like "so what....who's Kell Brook?". Other than the payday, it doesn't really do anything for Khan's career aspirations.Comment
-
Like I said, I don't see why Khan needs excuses to fight more highly regarded and more well known fighters.Mayweathers not going to fight Khan anyway and he won't get a bigger 'super fight' than fighting Brook. And you go on about exposure, Froch Groves 2 did 900.000 during the day on HBO. And Khans known more than both of those two in America so it would do a mill plus over there easy. So stop coming with these BS excuses, it's always the same ****** s*it.
Remove head from arse and stop thinking about this purely from a selfish position just cos you want Brook to get the fight. Khan-Brook benefits Brook far more than it does Khan and that's why you've thrown logic out the window here.
Brook would beat Marquez and Bradley on the same night now? LOL...listen to yourself.Comment
-
Just do the Brook-Khan thing. I'm sure that title is something you would want. We might be having a 3-belt Champion soon and the fourth will be a prime target.Comment
Comment