People calling for a national comission to govern boxing

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CJRock
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Nov 2006
    • 486
    • 36
    • 2
    • 6,897

    #11
    Teddy would stop the corruption . I'm sure he knows enough honest men that love the sport to assist him. Something has to be done that's for sure.
    Today we all know if we're honest that if Floyd did fight Manny in Vegas & both are standing at the final bell Floyd would get the decision regardless.
    This is just not right. The best man on the night should get the win not the homie

    Comment

    • MDPopescu
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2012
      • 24153
      • 1,504
      • 2,009
      • 4,138,611

      #12
      ... make it socialist -- and you'll see true corruption then...

      Comment

      • Dr Rumack
        I Also Cook
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2012
        • 11870
        • 683
        • 303
        • 22,101

        #13
        The overwhelming majority of big fights still happen in the US. Despite the global nature of the sport, a national governing commission would still have huge influence.

        Boxing will never fix itself. Without external pressure, nothing will change. Anyone who tries to change the sport for the better will have some some other crook undercut them.

        Comment

        • Foreign Soil
          First Time Skeptic
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2013
          • 5249
          • 194
          • 219
          • 11,783

          #14
          It's just a cry by people who think through emotions and need to express themselves. There's exactly zero evidence to show that a national commission would improve the state of boxing.

          Comment

          • Robbie Barrett
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2013
            • 40891
            • 2,779
            • 667
            • 570,921

            #15
            As long as people decide who wins you're always going to see cards you disagree with because people can't be completely neutral.

            Comment

            • KillerJones
              Contender
              • Jan 2015
              • 154
              • 9
              • 1
              • 6,219

              #16
              If the purpose is to regulate the sport, than one could only assume it would be far less corrupt than it is now.

              And supposed governing bodies pretty much condone cheating, by letting Peterson off the hook. Boxing seriously needs regulations.

              Too many obvious PED cheating, with old men, and obviously roided out fighters.

              If it takes an American organisation to lead the way, or even regulate all big time boxing, since most of it happens in the US anyway, its still good for the sport.

              Comment

              • Check_hooks
                The Don of NSB
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Feb 2010
                • 12099
                • 966
                • 1,875
                • 25,959

                #17
                I'm not sure if this is the answer but things definitely need to be improved

                When there are two fighters than speak different languages, there needs to be a bi-lingual ref

                Comment

                • JimEarl
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Jan 2015
                  • 181
                  • 5
                  • 0
                  • 6,355

                  #18
                  It might not guarantee no corruption but it would lessen it if only it were possible.......unfortunately I see little possibility in implementing such a plan at this point in history. Boxing is the only sport without a single policing organization. With several sanctioning bodies and competing promoters with their own agendas you'd never get everybody on board for any number of reasons, not the least being regulating PED controls which is hard enough in pro cycling which has only one sanctioning body with a recent history of corruption.

                  It would take an act of congress and I hope they aren't talking about any congressional involvement. There's too much "special interest influence" in congress already, lol.
                  Last edited by JimEarl; 01-09-2015, 07:12 AM.

                  Comment

                  • Furn
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2010
                    • 4758
                    • 318
                    • 35
                    • 43,020

                    #19
                    I must say I love you guys optimism and hope for the future.

                    Surely its worth a try ?

                    Whats the point of getting out of bed for most of you ?

                    Comment

                    • -PBP-
                      32 Time World Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jan 2012
                      • 24107
                      • 836
                      • 635
                      • 34,297

                      #20
                      It's impossible. You will have one corruot governing body instead of 4. Which would be worse.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP