Could a prime Sugar Shane clean out current WW?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Szef
    Face of Boxing
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2012
    • 15017
    • 2,490
    • 1,557
    • 253,303

    #31
    Originally posted by Pan-Africanist
    That's what happens when you get in a fight. Manny was put to sleep twice by two cab drivers. Hopkins loss to Jermaine Taylor twice.
    Is Shane Mosley an average fighter, yes or no?

    Comment

    • Robbie Barrett
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2013
      • 40891
      • 2,779
      • 667
      • 570,921

      #32
      Originally posted by Pan-Africanist
      My bad I meant 13-9-1. He had 34 career wins at LW not 32. I went back and counted.
      4 of those losses and the draw weren't at WW and the guys he did lose to at WW were ATG/HOF fighters not average fighters. Nothing average at all.

      Comment

      • jas
        Voice of Reason
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2005
        • 22532
        • 936
        • 914
        • 1,059,614

        #33
        Originally posted by Szef
        Now that you've removed that ridiculous P4P list you use to rock, I'm really digging your sig.
        Thanks for reminding me.

        Gonna add it back in now.

        Gonna look something like this:

        1. Hopkins
        2. PAC
        3 rigo
        4. Bradley
        5. Thurman
        6. Ggg
        7. Roman
        8. Kovalev
        9. Mayweather
        10. Wlad
        Last edited by jas; 12-28-2014, 08:56 AM.

        Comment

        • Outwest Exp 355
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2012
          • 9759
          • 1,183
          • 921
          • 47,595

          #34
          Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
          4 of those losses and the draw weren't at WW and the guys he did lose to at WW were ATG/HOF fighters not average fighters. Nothing average at all.
          So are you saying he was better at WW than LW? No matter how you try and explain the man was a much better LW. It's not a knock it's just the simple truth.

          Comment

          • Szef
            Face of Boxing
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Feb 2012
            • 15017
            • 2,490
            • 1,557
            • 253,303

            #35
            Originally posted by jas
            Thanks for reminding me.

            Gonna add it back in now.

            Gonna look something like this:

            1. Hopkins
            2. PAC
            3 rigo
            4. Bradley
            5. Thurman
            6. Ggg
            7. Roman
            8. Kovalev
            9. Mayweather
            10. Wlad
            This mothe****er knows his boxing, no doubt about it.

            Comment

            • bojangles1987
              bo jungle
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jul 2009
              • 41118
              • 1,326
              • 357
              • 63,028

              #36
              Originally posted by Pan-Africanist
              So are you saying he was better at WW than LW? No matter how you try and explain the man was a much better LW. It's not a knock it's just the simple truth.
              He wasn't a much better lightweight, if he fought the level of competition at LW that he fought at WW and above he would have lost then, too.

              Comment

              • Scott9945
                Gonna be more su****ious
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2007
                • 22032
                • 741
                • 1,371
                • 30,075

                #37
                Originally posted by jas
                No .

                Besides, he would come up dirty in a drug test
                Shane has never failed a drug test. The only reason he is associated with it was that he showed up on a BALCO list and was forced to testify in front of a grand jury.

                Comment

                • lfc19titles
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 8731
                  • 725
                  • 628
                  • 94,838

                  #38
                  prime mosley was on drugs, that is a 100 percent fact

                  the answer is yes, a prime mosley on drugs would have defeated the current wws easily, he would have also beaten a prime may and pac

                  Comment

                  • Ray*
                    Be safe!!!
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jul 2005
                    • 44867
                    • 1,654
                    • 1,608
                    • 558,890

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Scott9945
                    Shane has never failed a drug test. The only reason he is associated with it was that he showed up on a BALCO list and was forced to testify in front of a grand jury.
                    So what if he never failed a test? The fact was Mosley was on performance enhancing drugs, boxing testing procedure is one of the worse in sport.

                    Comment

                    • M Bison
                      Perfect, but you're not
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Mar 2012
                      • 15677
                      • 600
                      • 798
                      • 32,424

                      #40
                      Clean the entire division out?
                      Ofcourse he wouldn't, don't be silly he came across certain fighters before in his career and he got shown up and that was in his prime there is enough talent in the WW division to cause him a lot of problems and likely enough to hand him a couple of defeats.

                      I'd give Thurman a good chance of doing it and also Maidana and Khan.
                      We can forget about the obvious Pacquiao and Mayweather, they'd beat him regardless.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP