There was a time when boxing was regarded as a young man's game, in almost every division, 30 was regarded as old, 32 almost ancient, 35 shot.
Now, looking at The Ring's P4P list, 8 of the top P4P guys are 30 or over, 5 of them are 35+ and few of them look like losing to any young, hungry contender.
Looking at a list of the leading titlists in boxing, the vast majority are 30 or more.
Why is that? A trend I've been seeing is that fighters are taking longer to develop, maybe it's the rise of the eastern european nations and their long and arduous amateurs journeys. Few turn pro before the age of 25.
The lower divisions are slightly better off, especially with the explosion of talent from Japan but the ageing numbers are growing. Obviously fighters have better nutrients and an entire team of sports scientists looking after them but I think there is a deeper rooted problem: a lack of young talent coming through as the pool for fighters gets smaller and smaller.
What do you all think?
Now, looking at The Ring's P4P list, 8 of the top P4P guys are 30 or over, 5 of them are 35+ and few of them look like losing to any young, hungry contender.
Looking at a list of the leading titlists in boxing, the vast majority are 30 or more.
Why is that? A trend I've been seeing is that fighters are taking longer to develop, maybe it's the rise of the eastern european nations and their long and arduous amateurs journeys. Few turn pro before the age of 25.
The lower divisions are slightly better off, especially with the explosion of talent from Japan but the ageing numbers are growing. Obviously fighters have better nutrients and an entire team of sports scientists looking after them but I think there is a deeper rooted problem: a lack of young talent coming through as the pool for fighters gets smaller and smaller.
What do you all think?
Comment