Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Floyd in depth interview. "I dont mean being a rich coward"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by johnm is... View Post
    I mean, I get that it's a cute, slightly humorous quote, but it really doesn't fit there.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Deevel916 View Post
      Why doesn't the interviewer ask him the most obvious question of all. Are you currently in negotiations for a May 2nd showdown with Pac! If so what would it take to get the fight done. What would Manny have to accept in order for you to say "lets do it"

      Seems like the point of this interview is to try and take some blame away from himself for the fight not happening amidst all the talk from Pacquiao practically telling Floyd "stop the games and lets do this!"
      Because it's Floydhype and they are biased. Simple.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by V.WEBB View Post
        I've literally been missing on here for months, but the constant remains:

        Floyd says nothing about fighting Manny = he's ducking the fight.

        Floyd says something about fighting Manny = he's ducking the fight.

        Par for the course.
        Manny says nothing about fighting Floyd = he's ducking the fight

        Manny says something about fighting Floyd = he's desperate

        No surprise from Floyd and his stans with full of excuses

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by johnm is... View Post


          You got it. Some things never change.
          And if he fights Pacquiao, he's ducking Khan.

          I hate to admit it, but this ****ing guy cannot win in some of these people's eyes.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by V.WEBB View Post
            I've literally been missing on here for months, but the constant remains:

            Floyd says nothing about fighting Manny = he's ducking the fight.

            Floyd says something about fighting Manny = he's ducking the fight.

            Par for the course.
            What is it about ducking that you still don't understand?

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Pu·gi·list View Post
              Manny says nothing about fighting Floyd = he's ducking the fight

              Manny says something about fighting Floyd = he's desperate

              No surprise from Floyd and his stans with full of excuses
              Both side do it if not a fan boy i see trash from both so we can have a khan/floyd fight and pac/vargas both are garbage fights if no fight between the two they need to **** off and let the young guys shine...

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by Deevel916 View Post
                Why doesn't the interviewer ask him the most obvious question of all. Are you currently in negotiations for a May 2nd showdown with Pac! If so what would it take to get the fight done. What would Manny have to accept in order for you to say "lets do it"

                Seems like the point of this interview is to try and take some blame away from himself for the fight not happening amidst all the talk from Pacquiao practically telling Floyd "stop the games and lets do this!"
                Its clear that there are certain, direct questions that journalists cant ask.

                Also, lets be clear about something, Pac and Floyd arent at the negotiation table.

                They just know what they are told.

                I do think that Floyd has made it clear that he's given his team the marching orders to get the fight done. Doesnt mean it will, but he is clear in that he is trying to make it happen.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Peolpe asking why he saying the samething he said years ago...because nobody seems to have heard him or they dont want to hear the truth. How many times can you prove that the B side was bull****tting the entire time since the first negotiations...I mean Floyd might have to show the contract he signed but Pac didnt due to blood testing. But that wouldnt change these racists and blind casual fans minds. Cause clearly the blood testing excuse was a oke since as of Now Pacquiao has had how many fights with testing? yeah exactly B side is full of it has always been full of it and now they say they dont want to fight on may 2 like they dont know floyd fights in May like he has his own national holiday...F* Arum and his casual fanbase letting Mayweather take blame for the ish they do to avoid him and make money off him by not fighting him. Just unfair on so many levels. Its like the kid who can do no wrong in class but you know he cheats and steals the answer sheets when teacher isnt looking but somehow he gets all the attention and praises from the teachers and peers smdh!
                  Last edited by TIGERPRIDE; 12-17-2014, 02:58 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Money Boy TBE View Post
                    I swear you some of you guys literally must have a low IQ....he means he doesnt give a fxck what you say lol....that is what he means is he could give a fxck less what you call him but you continue to hate...

                    Pacman is the b side, floyd is the A side...its not that hard to comprehend....floyd was once b side too....just because you are a manny fan doesnt mean he cant be the B side...A side calls shots and thats floyd...unless manny wants to comply he wont get the fight its that simple
                    Let me test that IQ which I doubt you even know the meaning of I and Q nevertheless.

                    in a coin which has more value the head or the tail?
                    in a cassette tape and a vinyl record which did you pay more Side A or Side B?

                    one goes with the other, one has no value at all with out the other
                    find me a coin which is a legal tender but only have head and and the other side is blank
                    "peeleft:

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Rath View Post
                      Let me test that IQ which I doubt you even know the meaning of I and Q nevertheless.

                      in a coin which has more value the head or the tail?
                      in a cassette tape and a vinyl record which did you pay more Side A or Side B?

                      one goes with the other, one has no value at all with out the other
                      find me a coin which is a legal tender but only have head and and the other side is blank
                      "peeleft:
                      You literally are failing at sounding witty lmao...just stop

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP