Who rates higher now: Bradley or Khan?

[The Hammer]

I see ESPN and many others have Bradley ahead of Khan on their P4P and welterweight lists.

It appeared last night that Khan is now clearly better than Bradley.

What do you think?

[-MEGA-]

Bradley is still better. He beat alexander years ago when he was undefeated.

[SterlingStained]

bradley has marquez, alexander (before khan), and pacquiao on his resume.

khan has to step back like elie sekhback.

[Hitman Hodgson]

Bradley still ranks higher even though I think Khan beats him.

[gmc_rfc_06]

I'm not really a fan of either, but I'd give Bradley a slight edge for his work at 147.

[The Hammer]

bradley has marquez, alexander (before khan), and pacquiao on his resume.

khan has to step back like elie sekhback.

Pacquiao beat Bradley twice, each time by wide decision (scorecards in the first fight were BS).

Marquez was old as Methuselah when Bradley won, and appeared to be unmotivated and lethargic.

Khan beat a better-prepared, more experienced Alexander much more impressively.

[Fetta]

Bradley is overatted. Khan beats him

[UpInThisYo]

Bradley, of course. I would like Khan vs. Bradley.

[Strategic1]

Bradley.

Bradley would've practically shut Chaves out but the swollen eye put him in semi-survival mode.

[-Lowkey-]

If people are trying to give Bradley credit for the first Pac fight they should also by the same logic be detracting from Bradley for only managing a draw against Chavez.

I think Khan would beat Bradley handily at this point.