It means a lot if you are fighting top fighters,champions and have been doing it for almost 20 years and have gone through multiple divisions...being undefeated has to mean something as when a fighter loses on here he is trashed(except certain fighters) called hype jobs,say they were exposed and or overrated...so you tell me which is it?
That is a great accomplishment Larry, considering what era they are in. My point is look at the process of negotiating a fight today. "Are they fighting on my network?" "Are they signed with my manager?" "Can I sell a lot of PPV's with this fight?" "Which fight I can make the most money?" These questions were irrelevant back then. They are sticking points now. Fighters today limit themselves by doing this. Their resume could be even better without these politics.
This thread was for undefeated fighters in general. Not just mayweather. You have to look at guys like Leo Santa Cruz, Peter Quillen, Adonis Stevenson, and so on. Fighters who really benefit from the politics.
This thread was for undefeated fighters in general. Not just mayweather. You have to look at guys like Leo Santa Cruz, Peter Quillen, Adonis Stevenson, and so on. Fighters who really benefit from the politics.
Did you even read the ****ing thread? Jesus Christ.
You said if they're undefeated they are cherry picking. If he lost to 5 of those "cherry picks" would he still be cherry picking? Lets discredit a fighter for being good.
Comment