Adrien Broner vs Prime Felix Trinidad

[Dean_Razorback]

Think outside the box for a change, we aint talking about argentinians here.

don't get your point, trinidad was a fucking beast. he would have a picnic with broner, too static, too immobile, too inactive.

[LouIE G]

don't get your point, trinidad was a fucking beast. he would have a picnic with broner, too static, too immobile, too inactive.

I know your bias towards argentinians, and thats fine but from what you say about broner the same can be said about tito... tito is notoriously known for fighting in straight lines with no lateral movement!! Theres evidence that backs my claim.

[hhs661]

Were talking about ratio , and this is ww were talking about not jmw or mw, not everything else.thanks doe.

Then let's talk about quality of opposition. The four that Maidana didn't ko are who exactly?

Tito didn't ko dlh, whitaker, camacho and who else? I won't count Reid since that fight was at 154. Meanwhile Maidana didn't knock off ab, lost almost half of his ww fights so there's not much room for an argument really. is there?

But you can't use ratio then say only ww fights. it's one or the other

[LouIE G]

Then let's talk about quality of opposition. The four that Maidana didn't ko are who exactly?

Tito didn't ko dlh, whitaker, camacho and who else? I won't count Reid since that fight was at 154. Meanwhile Maidana didn't knock off ab, lost almost half of his ww fights so there's not much room for an argument really. is there?

But you can't use ratio then say only ww fights. it's one or the other

Dude i wont engage you, because you wont acknowledge maidana has a better ko ratio then tito...and quality of opposition has nothing to do with ko ratio...look at GGG, and Kovalev 2 of the most praised fighters on NSB.

[Dean_Razorback]

I know your bias towards argentinians, and thats fine but from what you say about broner the same can be said about tito... tito is notoriously known for fighting in straight lines with no lateral movement!! Theres evidence that backs my claim.

i support my guys, that's true. but didn't know tito was argentinian, as far as i know he is puerto rican

[LouIE G]

Then let's talk about quality of opposition. The four that Maidana didn't ko are who exactly?

Tito didn't ko dlh, whitaker, camacho and who else? I won't count Reid since that fight was at 154. Meanwhile Maidana didn't knock off ab, lost almost half of his ww fights so there's not much room for an argument really. is there?

But you can't use ratio then say only ww fights. it's one or the other

KO RATIO or ww fights, maidana still has a better ko ratio then tito.. you cant spin that. Thanks doe

[LouIE G]

i support my guys, that's true. but didn't know tito was argentinian, as far as i know he is puerto rican

That aint obvious??? I rephrase it then, you back punchers then..

[Dean_Razorback]

That aint obvious??? I rephrase it then, you back punchers then..

i still don't understand you man, and you think trinidad was just a puncher? you put broner at whitaker's level

[hhs661]

Dude i wont engage you, because you wont acknowledge maidana has a better ko ratio then tito...and quality of opposition has nothing to do with ko ratio...look at GGG, and Kovalev 2 of the most praised fighters on NSB.

WWs Maidana hasn't stopped... Floyd twice, ab, Alexander. That's 4 out of 7 that he didn't stop.

Trinidad at ww didn't stop dlh, whitaker, camacho, and who else at ww? Redo your percentages. titos is still higher at WW

[LouIE G]

i still don't understand you man, and you think trinidad was just a puncher? you put broner at whitaker's level

Never that, i can bring up certain fighters to make my case without comparing them to eachother...you guys say tito would ko broner?? Thats fine but i disagree.. if maidana who has a better ko ratio then tito couldnt do it, why would i be convinced tito can?? Ive been watching boxing for 22 years, i think i can make a good analogy of that..