Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao should be FOTY 2014

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
    Yeah i know. Just watched Liverpool v Stoke! It seemed so natural when I wrote it

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by ElMeroChingon View Post
      Pacquiao beat down Bradley in his weight class, Who is a better fighter than Gamboa, by a long shot. Aligeri win is also impressive, complete wipe out, what was it? 6 KD's, the guy who outboxed RUslan, one of the most feared fighters in the division.

      Crawford's win over Burns was ok. Burns should've lost to Beltran, i actually see Beltran, Manny's sparring partner, as a better fighter. And Gamboa has looked like *****, he was nearly gettin Ko'ed by journey men, came back after a long lay off to fight Crawford at a weightclass he doesn't belong. Don't get me wrong, great string of wins for Crawford, and i like seeing that from the up and coming generation, but Pacquiao competed at a higher caliber, and made it look easy, really easy.

      Fans need to settle down a little bit, look at the real picture. I know it's fun seeing new fighters stringing good wins together, but Pacquiao was far more dominant, against better competition.

      Pacquiao should be fighter of the year.
      This!
      Very true, I think most people rooting for TC are only doing it because of similar nationalities.

      Pacquiao clearly has the better wins against active opponents.

      Ricky Burns - Should have lost to Beltran and he had just returned from an operation to sort out his jaw, since losing to TC he lost to an absolute nobody.

      Beltran - He has no big wins on his record and has been stopped before by nobodies.

      Gamboa - Year of inactivity and yes he was getting starched hard by guys he should have been schooling that and he was fighting at a weight class that was too big for him mix that in with the fact that TC is very big for lightweight it takes a lot of the shine off TC best win.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Red Cyclone View Post
        This!
        Very true, I think most people rooting for TC are only doing it because of similar nationalities.

        Pacquiao clearly has the better wins against active opponents.

        Ricky Burns - Should have lost to Beltran and he had just returned from an operation to sort out his jaw, since losing to TC he lost to an absolute nobody.

        Beltran - He has no big wins on his record and has been stopped before by nobodies.

        Gamboa - Year of inactivity and yes he was getting starched hard by guys he should have been schooling that and he was fighting at a weight class that was too big for him mix that in with the fact that TC is very big for lightweight it takes a lot of the shine off TC best win.
        Beltran beat hank Lundy.

        I think most would agree that was a pretty good win.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Red Cyclone View Post
          This!
          Very true, I think most people rooting for TC are only doing it because of similar nationalities.

          Pacquiao clearly has the better wins against active opponents.

          Ricky Burns - Should have lost to Beltran and he had just returned from an operation to sort out his jaw, since losing to TC he lost to an absolute nobody.

          Beltran - He has no big wins on his record and has been stopped before by nobodies.

          Gamboa - Year of inactivity and yes he was getting starched hard by guys he should have been schooling that and he was fighting at a weight class that was too big for him mix that in with the fact that TC is very big for lightweight it takes a lot of the shine off TC best win.
          Beltran beat hank Lundy.

          I think most would agree that was a pretty good win.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
            Lol Jonathan. Sorry, Nicholas.

            Well, he won. That's what we know. A lot of people felt Bradley lost to provodnikov which means he would have been 1-2 going into the Pacquiao fight by your standards.

            Isn't so impressive anymore then.
            bradley was p4p number 3 at the time

            lara is not a grade A fighter, he is a B fighter

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by jas View Post
              bradley was p4p number 3 at the time

              lara is not a grade A fighter, he is a B fighter
              Lol alright.

              Couldn't care less about some mythical ranking. Bradley was never #3 in real life and pacquiao was favoured to beat him yet was #5 by the time they fought.

              Makes sense right? No? That shows you how much the P4P rankings means.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by ElMeroChingon View Post
                Pacquiao beat down Bradley in his weight class, Who is a better fighter than Gamboa, by a long shot. Aligeri win is also impressive, complete wipe out, what was it? 6 KD's, the guy who outboxed RUslan, one of the most feared fighters in the division.

                Crawford's win over Burns was ok. Burns should've lost to Beltran, i actually see Beltran, Manny's sparring partner, as a better fighter. And Gamboa has looked like *****, he was nearly gettin Ko'ed by journey men, came back after a long lay off to fight Crawford at a weightclass he doesn't belong. Don't get me wrong, great string of wins for Crawford, and i like seeing that from the up and coming generation, but Pacquiao competed at a higher caliber, and made it look easy, really easy.

                Fans need to settle down a little bit, look at the real picture. I know it's fun seeing new fighters stringing good wins together, but Pacquiao was far more dominant, against better competition.

                Pacquiao should be fighter of the year.

                im sorry but just because he got an arguable decision against provo then was hyped as much as a fighter can be for the next 6 months dont make it an impressive victory at all if pac is fighter of the year after beating a guy he already beat and beating algeiri then our sport of boxing is done as far a awards go

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by lacedup View Post
                  lol alright.

                  Couldn't care less about some mythical ranking. Bradley was never #3 in real life and pacquiao was favoured to beat him yet was #5 by the time they fought.

                  Makes sense right? No? That shows you how much the p4p rankings means.


                  bradley was a top 10 p4p fighter, thats the point, he was and still is an elite fighter, thats the point
                  Last edited by jas; 12-02-2014, 06:00 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by jas View Post
                    bradley was a top 10 p4p fighter, thats the point, he was and still is an elite fighter, thats the point
                    The point is Nonito Donaire was just as good a win and so was Lara.

                    People said Lara would beat Mayweather ffs. Bradley had already been beaten by Pacquiao, rematch was pointless and nobody was asking for it. But good job on rewriting history.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      who has beaten a higher p4p fighter than bradley this year?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP