Pacquiao-Khan at Wembley Stadium next year.

[SplitSecond]

I doubt Bob Arum will let Manny fight in England, that too against someone like Khan who's hard to beat on cards.

Offcourse it'll fill up Wembley., but Pac will end up losing the fight if it goes on cards.

this fight wouldn't go the distance

[VG_Addict]

Pacquiao wouldn't need to worry about the cards. He'd put Khan to sleep.

[Evol]

I doubt Bob Arum will let Manny fight in England, that too against someone like Khan who's hard to beat on cards.

Offcourse it'll fill up Wembley., but Pac will end up losing the fight if it goes on cards.

The same Bob that didn't have a problem robbing manny in the first bradley fight? lol. Let's not act like Manny is bob's overly protected son or something lol, manny to arum is like a cheap h0e is to arum, use and abuse. Bob don't give a damm about pac.

[IAintBiasedTho]

To be honest, it is to the point where you just have to find who would be the most challenging to either fighter, because resume wise..nobody that they haven't beaten deserve a fight

Mayweather - I see GGG causing Mayweather huge problems, purely because of his size. Mayweather at 37 is not entitled to take such a fight, though it would be very big on his resume. I honestly think people under-appreciate the Canelo win..that was a huge win at his age.

Pacquiao - Thurman/GGG pose the biggest problems for Pacquiao. I do not see Thurman causing the same problems for Mayweather that he would pose to Pacquiao based on his style. Thurmans ability to counterpunch on the move is one of the best I've ever seen. That on top of his willingless to engage, power, and youth..I think he takes Pacquiao out in 10. GGG of course because of the size different, but like mayweather, he does not need to take this fight. The Bradley 2 win was a HUGE IMO and also under-appreciated.

They just need to fight each other and stop giving us sparring matches.