Chris Eubank vs Michael Nunn at 168

**GunStar** · 03-14-2006, 01:45 AM

Originally posted by JuicyJuice

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree

Hagler was a shadow of his former self in those years. His peak was 1977/78 as a power-hitting, counter-puncher.

I guess so

Actually I think Haglers peak was around 80 - 82. He is my all time favorite fighter.

**JuicyJuice** · 03-14-2006, 06:09 AM

Originally posted by Gunstar1

I guess so

Actually I think Haglers peak was around 80 - 82. He is my all time favorite fighter.

So your not being biased if you say Nunn wouldn't of beaten him had he fought him instead of Leonard fighting him?

**SnoopySmurf** · 03-14-2006, 08:59 AM

Originally posted by JuicyJuice

Eubank would of out-jabbed him.

wouldHAVE not would "of"....

Comment