Froch can beat Kovalev

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • betmen
    Indonesian
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 4763
    • 310
    • 254
    • 28,570

    #51
    Quicker? better jab?? wtf you're talking about??? Kova has the quicker foots and hands also a lot of variation of jabs. Kova would dominate him if they fight at 175 but i believe Froch chin will hold trough the 12th round

    Comment

    • Dirk Diggler UK
      Deleted
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 48836
      • 1,312
      • 693
      • 58,902

      #52
      Originally posted by HeroBando
      You're really working hard to excuse this fight from being made. So little confidence in the Cobra. Lets hope for the British megafight with DeGale
      Nice projecting and misquoting there. You really have a knack for that. It's a pity you and Freedom weren't born in **** Germany

      I am just stating the truth. Froch has always made the 168lb limit very easily and is usually under the light heavyweight limit on fight night.

      I have nothing against him moving up in weight if he wants to. I just don't see it happening at this stage of his career.

      Now where does the idea that Froch is a "big super middleweight" come from?
      Last edited by Dirk Diggler UK; 11-09-2014, 07:23 PM.

      Comment

      • bojangles1987
        bo jungle
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2009
        • 41118
        • 1,326
        • 357
        • 63,028

        #53
        You're crazy.

        Froch is not faster, his chin is not good enough, he's way too open, near the end of his career, and most of all he's much smaller. Froch is one of the few guys who sticks close to his division limit all the time and doesn't put much weight after weigh ins.

        Kovalev would destroy him. It wouldn't be fair.

        Comment

        • bojangles1987
          bo jungle
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2009
          • 41118
          • 1,326
          • 357
          • 63,028

          #54
          Originally posted by soul_survivor
          Kovalev couldn't batter a 49 year old man...

          Why are you hating on Kovalev? He was never hurt against Hopkins, and he sure as hell battered the old man. Your posts today read like you just want to hate on Kovalev for whatever reason.

          Comment

          • bojangles1987
            bo jungle
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2009
            • 41118
            • 1,326
            • 357
            • 63,028

            #55
            Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
            What do you base this on?

            Oh yeah....nothing. Just lies and propaganda as usual from you.
            He never got over Froch wiping out Bute.

            Comment

            • LacedUp
              Still Smokin'
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 29171
              • 781
              • 381
              • 132,163

              #56
              Kovalev impressed me man. Good speed and awesome power. Not sure I'd go down that route if I was Froch. I'd rather meet GGG than Kovalev at this stage.

              Kovalev is awesome. He should focus on getting Stevenson in the ring and become undisputed champion.

              Comment

              • The Hammer
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 50797
                • 3,416
                • 8,704
                • 58,851

                #57
                Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                Can't see it.

                Froch isn't built for 175, Kovalev would have 15 or so lbs on him and at this stage of his career Kovalev would be way too much for him.
                Like Bernard Hopkins said, throughout most of boxing history the 168 division didn't even exist and it's been used as a place for light heavyweights to hide.

                What division would Froch fight in if he boxed back in the days of Harry Greb and Gene Tunney, or in the days of Jimmy Bivins and Archie Moore?
                Last edited by The Hammer; 11-09-2014, 08:10 PM.

                Comment

                • BoZz
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 8812
                  • 876
                  • 779
                  • 45,907

                  #58
                  Froch would kill the russian bum..beating a 50 year old man means nothing

                  Comment

                  • lefthook2daliva
                    huh?
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 5569
                    • 190
                    • 594
                    • 18,317

                    #59
                    Originally posted by soul_survivor
                    That's my opinion, Froch is quicker, has a better jab, hits damn hard and might have a better chin. It would be a great fight either way and I think Froch should go in confident, this is a chance for him to solidify his legacy as one of the best this generation
                    You're right,imo.

                    But he loses.

                    On the other hand, great adversity encourages great accomplishments.

                    Froch is a baddass old pro...

                    I'd watch it.

                    Comment

                    • Dirk Diggler UK
                      Deleted
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 48836
                      • 1,312
                      • 693
                      • 58,902

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Freedom2014
                      Like Bernard Hopkins said, throughout most of boxing history the 168 division didn't even exist and it's been used as a place for light heavyweights to hide.

                      What division would Froch fight in if he boxed back in the days of Harry Greb and Gene Tunney, or in the days of Jimmy Bivins and Archie Moore?
                      What the ***?

                      I think this f@ggot just beat his own record for "Most Tedious Line of Argument"

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP