Comments Thread For: Marquez on Pacquiao 5: Honor is Worth More Than Money!

[ADP02]

Marquez is a man of honor. You have to admire him for taking this stance when he could make a lot of money for betraying his principles.

Much respect to him.

That is the thing. What priniciples?

He wanted to retire instead of taking the money? No.
He wanted to fight for a title instead of taking the fight? No. Now Manny has a title so we know that was a lie.


Marquez's principles:
- 0-2-1 : I know that I have not won a fight yet but I want to fight Manny for a 4th fight.

- 1-2-1 : I finally won. I want to keep this feeling because I may never win again. So no way do I want to fight Manny again.

[Mr.Fantastic]

You're still officially 1-2-1 against him, it really should be 1-3 against him if you count the ref who couldn't do basic math

this is like the kid in high school who beats you one time at mortal kombat and never plays you again

Pretty true. I had the feeling though that Marquez was going to pull that off if he beat Pac on the scorecards.

[fabie]

is it fcuk. the difference is the first 3 fights were all close and could have gone either way, therefore a rematch is warranted. the 4th fight ended in a KO. should pacman have rematched hatton? didnt think so.

There's a big difference...Hatton was overwhelmed, dominated and clearly outmatched even before the final KO.

With Pac and Marquez, the final fight was actually a seemingly imminent win (perhaps one can say that a TKO or a KO is about to happen to Marquez) with the founds preceding the KO (lighting caught in a bottle).

All credits were given to Marquez - it was one for the ages, but the fight was again not clearly a one-sided fight BEFORE that KO. Thus there are lingering questions still unanswered.

So the usage of HATTON as your example sir, is a poor one.

[pasawayako]

Pac doesn't need marquez. pac is 2-1-1 vs jmm and a 5th fight is not necessary.

[puga]

Dont really blame jmm for not feeling like giving pac a rematch...afterall, that really was his ultimate mission of his whole career since 2004.....youve reached the top the top by going through hell and back, why start the same journey....then again, many people still call for a fight coz honestly jmm's victory was a shot in the dark.....real talk......honestly, i lost interest coz pac wont get much credit if he win (and theres a good chance he'll again)altho he looks more past it than jmm....

[solo20]

There's a big difference...Hatton was overwhelmed, dominated and clearly outmatched even before the final KO.

With Pac and Marquez, the final fight was actually a seemingly imminent win (perhaps one can say that a TKO or a KO is about to happen to Marquez) with the founds preceding the KO (lighting caught in a bottle).

All credits were given to Marquez - it was one for the ages, but the fight was again not clearly a one-sided fight BEFORE that KO. Thus there are lingering questions still unanswered.

So the usage of HATTON as your example sir, is a poor one.

"lingering questions still unanswered"

WTF YOU ARE JOKING RIGTH PAC GOT KNOCK THE **** OUT COLD ALL QUESTIONS ANSWER

[fabie]

"lingering questions still unanswered"

WTF YOU ARE JOKING RIGTH PAC GOT KNOCK THE **** OUT COLD ALL QUESTIONS ANSWER

No, I am not joking. Pacquiao's desire to fight him is still there while warranted. I am not talking about the crowd.

[seal]

Just STFU and say that you're scared to fight him.

Memo gave you power-piss to drink and that's the only reason you won that fight.

[PAC-BOY]

LOL JMM knows he will get his ass beat up from the the feet up. He got his ass beat 3 times. He finally got one. Now he dont want to fight. Hmmmmm
Manny gave him 3 shots for redemption...JMM gives none lol!

[SeekDaGreat]

Just STFU and say that you're scared to fight him.

Memo gave you power-piss to drink and that's the only reason you won that fight.

Lmfao. Basically.