Lewis really loss to Holyfield in rematch

[paulmmv]

i would hafe to say lewis without a doubt won the first fight and the second was closer but lewis still clearly won that fight too

[markosg19]

there is no denying that it was a close fight, but if you scored it for holyfield then you were looking to give him rounds, lewis won by about 2-3 rounds.

[Mike Tyson Jr.]

Sorry Mike,i couldn't resist it. Did you mean the "loss" thing-or have you already done the "Holyfield vs Lewis rematch" thread?
I will edit the "loss" word then.Later brother brolog.

what do you mean by the "loss"
thing?

[dagame328]

Holyfield should have won.

[tri4ben2]

It all depends on how you define the term "affective agression".

Holyfeild was definately the more aggressive, but it was not affective and even rooting for Holyfeild, I could not give it to him.

Lewis definately did not do enough to win without any controvery at all. He used his size and jab / 1-2 all night, but didn't ever really try to take Holyfeild out.

[dino]

holyfield got owned in both fights

[fist-of-fury]

For sure, Lewis did not win convincingly. I even thought it was a draw.

But there was a glaring revelation: Lewis at the time was already on the downhill, as shown by the fact that he had a mighty tough time with an aging, past-his-prime Holyfield.

[marvdave]

Lewis won both fights in my opinion.

[riz]

i didn't c the fight, can sum1 post it plz?

[hollister]

what do you mean by the "loss"
thing?

He probably means the way you typed "loss" instead of "lost", it's unique, and maybe he thought you did it on purpose as a way to kind of "mark" your threads, just my opinion.