Please don't compare Golovkin to Froch, just because they both have power it doesn't mean they are the same. GGG's skills and footwork are levels above Froch.
As for now Ward is the favourite and rightfully so, but I believe we haven't seen the best Golovkin yet.
This fight is a big question mark, Ward would be the best fighter Golovkin ever fought and VICE VERSA.
True, but Froch´s reach, chin and strength is superior to GGGs.
Ward have unquestionably fought at a higher level as a pro. GGG has not fought anyone that would even come remotely close to causing Ward problems, the same can definitely not be said in reverse.
However, that doesn´t mean GGG can´t win. It´s just not likely.
True, but Froch´s reach, chin and strength is superior to GGGs.
Ward have unquestionably fought at a higher level as a pro. GGG has not fought anyone that would even come remotely close to causing Ward problems, the same can definitely not be said in reverse.
However, that doesn´t mean GGG can´t win. It´s just not likely.
Reach? Absoultely. Strenght and chin? that remains to be seen, so far he looked very strong, he was pushing much heavier Rubio around the ring and he took his and Stevens' punches (who's a huge puncher) and didn't even blink.
Golovkin technique and skills are above anybody Ward ever fought, that's not even up to discussion, sure his resume is lacking, but you can tell he's a very special fighter. And like I said, I don't think we've had chance to see the very best Golovkin who brings his A game.
Also people are like Ward GGG will fight is the same active Ward who just won Super Six, what a crock of shit, he's been inactive for almost a year and counting, who knows how such a long break will affect him. As for as we know, Ward might not be the fighter he used to be.
People who think Ward will school GGG are delusional, it's a very even fight and for me Ward is the favourite only because of what he's accomplished several years ago.
Yeah. Froch's chin, although good, is overrated. It's not better than GGG's. I nearly cringe anytime UK fans call it "legendary". He's been dazed in so many fights, it's anything but legendary.
Yeah. Froch's chin, although good, is overrated. It's not better than GGG's. I nearly cringe anytime UK fans call it "legendary". He's been dazed in so many fights, it's anything but legendary.
That's because unlike Golovkin, he's fought people that punch back
That's because unlike Golovkin, he's fought people that punch back
GGG just fought someone that punches back, 2 days ago. Froch has fought better competition, surely, but he's gone down hard enough to see that his chin is clearly not legendary. He looked out cold on his way down vs Groves.
GGG just fought someone that punches back, 2 days ago. Froch has fought better competition, surely, but he's gone down hard enough to see that his chin is clearly not legendary. He looked out cold on his way down vs Groves.
He fought an absolute tomato can who came there to survive and for a paycheque. Like almost all of his opponents.
There is no way of saying GGG has a better chin until he faces the calibre of opposition that Froch has been facing.
Comment