The pressure to fight another worth while opponent is getting Floyd really nervous...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Steven A Smith beef with Floyd...how can you take Floyd's side here?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by SUBZER0ED View PostWe can debate who "earns" the right to fight whom all day. But aren't you at least a little interested in what Khan could do against Mayweather, given that a Pacquiao fight is non-existent? Khan has a weak chin, but has pop and speed, while Mayweather is an aging tactician with speed and some pop. I think it would be a fun fight to watch.
Amir is a talented fighter, without question. That said, why should he get a shot at a lineal ww title ahead of guys who actually fight and defeat ww's?
Comment
-
Originally posted by SUBZER0ED View PostDid anyone notice that Mayweather didn't blame Manny for not wanting to make the fight during his attack on Smith? He pretty much said that he is his own boss, and he'll fight two bums if he wants to. It's all about ego with Mayweather, and keeping that "0" at all costs. A well-known sports commentator like Smith calling him out must really burn his ass.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LinealChampion View PostThe only fight worth making outside of Pacquiao - Mayweather from a legacy standpoint is Glovokin or Miguel Cotto.
Canelo does nothing, as sure he might have a learned a little bit over the last year + but in general he still has the same problems that showed in the Lara fight.
So how Stephen A Smith thinks that Canelo deserves another chance is beyond me, I even had Guerrero winning 1 round vs Mayweather, Canelo 0
what does a cotto rematch do for Floyd's legacy? he already beat cotto. whats the point in doing it again?
and don't say the middleweight title because if floyd fights at middleweight, it has too be against the man everybody considers the true champ at 160. (ggg).
just like when Oscar went too 160, he could have said **** it after he got that gift against sturm. but he knew fighting at middleweight meant nothing if he didn't fight b hop. the true champ at 160 at the time.
I don't want no more rematches for Floyd.
Floyd/pacquiao
Floyd/Garcia
Floyd/Thurman
Floyd/Andrade
Floyd/khan
Floyd/golovkin
these are the fights that should be on the table for floyd
Comment
-
Originally posted by bluebeam View Postwhat does a cotto rematch do for Floyd's legacy? he already beat cotto. whats the point in doing it again?
and don't say the middleweight title because if floyd fights at middleweight, it has too be against the man everybody considers the true champ at 160. (ggg).
just like when Oscar went too 160, he could have said **** it after he got that gift against sturm. but he knew fighting at middleweight meant nothing if he didn't fight b hop. the true champ at 160 at the time.
I don't want no more rematches for Floyd.
Floyd/pacquiao
Floyd/Garcia
Floyd/Thurman
Floyd/Andrade
Floyd/khan
Floyd/golovkin
these are the fights that should be on the table for floyd
And when I bring up the losses it's to B and C level fighters. Khan lost in brutal KO fashion and Danny got outboxed by a guy nowhere near Floyd's level.Last edited by Beater_of_ass; 10-17-2014, 11:59 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostI don't think khan has done anything to earn a Floyd fight-same as Stephen A. I don't see the need or a Canelo rematch or a cotto rematch, but they are better than a khan fight IMO.
your point about styles is fair-but a guy who is 3-0 at ww shouldn't get a shot at the title.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View PostSo the JMM KO shouldn't be roadblock in making Floyd/Manny correct?
Come on BOA.
Comment
Comment