Bob's re matches or Haymons mismatches

[Vasyl’s dad]

What would you rather see?

[Sugar Adam Ali]

Manny-marquez
rios-alvarado
manny-bradley

are far more entertaining and meaningful then
broner-molina
danny-salka


I will take recycled big name fights over some cherrypicks

[BOXEO _]

Should've said what's worse, i'd rather not see either of them.

[hhs661]

I don't mind seeing rematches but what's the point if the winner of them sometimes gets a gift and the loser gets rewarded? As in Rios' case after the Alvarado rematch. As well as Manny-Bradley I where the decision was just ugly.

Those fights give boxing a bigger black eye than a mismatch, imo. A mismatch will easily be forgotten by the time they step up again. Plus, who really talks about the JMM-Ramos, Garcia-Salka, Cotto-Jennings etc etc type fights after a year or so?

[Divine Hammer]

definitely the rematches because you know that they'll 100% be competitive.

[John Locke]

Obviously the rematches. They might be a bit pointless and annoying, but they're at least competitive and entertaining.

[al-Xander]

The rematches are not mismatches. That's obvious. They happen because there are not enough fighters in the stable. What's unforgivable is when there are many equally-skilled fighters in the stable but would rather not fight each other. Garcia fighting Salsa instead of Peterson. Broner fighting Molina instead of Matthysse, Santa Cruz fighting a former sparring partner instead of..., Guerrero fighting Kamegai instead of Khan, Alexander, Thurman, etc. Haymon fighters are the biggest jokes in boxing today.

[Larry the boss]

Where is the neither option?

[Daylyt]

Rather neither but if I had to choose gun in face, Ill pick Arum rematches, at least they good solid fights just we seen them before, were as Haymon mismatches arent even entertaining.

[thuggery]

Voted Haymon's mismatches on accident, would much rather see these so called "recycled" fights from Top Rank.

I don't mind Rios vs Alvarado III one bit. It's only rumored at this point though.